Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	211	423
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	22.55	18.84
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	no data
GPU code name	TU106	no data
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)	no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	1536
Core clock speed	945 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1380 MHz	1500 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	198.7	no data
Floating-point processing power	6.359 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	144	no data
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	36	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.5	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	1.2.131	-
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.27
+139%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 10.97

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3000 Mobile 19879
+182%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3000 Mobile 50309
+109%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 24058

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3000 Mobile 14842
+113%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3000 Mobile 5589
+181%

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 1989

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	104 +181%	37 −181%
4K	88 +151%	35−40 −151%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45
+169%

16−18

−169%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	77 +157%	30−33 −157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +146%	35−40 −146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +152%	27−30 −152%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +152%	60−65 −152%
Hitman 3	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +157%	35−40 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +152%	27−30 −152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +154%	35−40 −154%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +165%	40−45 −165%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +171%	21−24 −171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +146%	35−40 −146%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +152%	27−30 −152%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +152%	60−65 −152%
Hitman 3	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +157%	35−40 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +152%	27−30 −152%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +154%	35−40 −154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +167%	21−24 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +165%	40−45 −165%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	39 +144%	16−18 −144%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +150%	24−27 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +152%	60−65 −152%
Hitman 3	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 +140%	50−55 −140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 +154%	35−40 −154%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +167%	21−24 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	100−110 +165%	40−45 −165%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
+152%

27−30

−152%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +143%	7−8 −143%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +150%	60−65 −150%
Hitman 3	30−35 +158%	12−14 −158%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +157%	21−24 −157%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +178%	18−20 −178%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +142%	24−27 −142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +143%	60−65 −143%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45
+144%

18−20

−144%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Hitman 3	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +144%	55−60 −144%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 +180%	5−6 −180%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +157%	14−16 −157%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +167%	12−14 −167%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%