Radeon Pro W6600 vs Quadro P620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P620 and Radeon Pro W6600, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P620
2018
2 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
9.43

Pro W6600 outperforms P620 by a whopping 329% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking46399
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.46
Power efficiency16.8428.87
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 February 2018 (6 years ago)8 June 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5121792
Core clock speed1177 MHz2331 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHz2903 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate46.18325.1
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPS10.4 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs32112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.43
Pro W6600 40.42
+329%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P620 3637
Pro W6600 15596
+329%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD46
−313%
190−200
+313%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−329%
270−280
+329%
Hitman 3 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−323%
220−230
+323%
Metro Exodus 35
−329%
150−160
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55
−318%
230−240
+318%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−326%
260−270
+326%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Battlefield 5 27−30
−314%
120−130
+314%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−329%
270−280
+329%
Hitman 3 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−323%
220−230
+323%
Metro Exodus 28
−329%
120−130
+329%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−326%
260−270
+326%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−313%
95−100
+313%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−300%
60−65
+300%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−309%
90−95
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−329%
270−280
+329%
Hitman 3 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−323%
220−230
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
−319%
130−140
+319%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−312%
70−75
+312%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−326%
260−270
+326%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−323%
110−120
+323%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−317%
75−80
+317%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
−329%
60−65
+329%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−315%
170−180
+315%
Hitman 3 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−325%
85−90
+325%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−323%
55−60
+323%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
−317%
250−260
+317%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−306%
65−70
+306%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Hitman 3 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
−310%
160−170
+310%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−317%
50−55
+317%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−300%
24−27
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4
−300%
12−14
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−289%
35−40
+289%

This is how Quadro P620 and Pro W6600 compete in popular games:

  • Pro W6600 is 313% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.43 40.42
Recency 1 February 2018 8 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro P620 has 150% lower power consumption.

Pro W6600, on the other hand, has a 328.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro W6600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
AMD Radeon Pro W6600
Radeon Pro W6600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 595 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 64 votes

Rate Radeon Pro W6600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.