Quadro P2200 vs P620

Place in performance ranking	435	210
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Value for money	20.76	32.18
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP107	GP106
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	27 May 2019 (4 years old)	10 June 2019 (4 years old)
Current price	$170	$409

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2200 has 55% better value for money than Quadro P620.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	1280
Core clock speed	1177 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	1493 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.33	119.4
Floating-point performance	1,490 gflops	no data

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm	201 mm
Width	1-slot	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5X
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	5 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	160 Bit
Memory clock speed	6000 MHz	10008 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80.13 GB/s	200.2 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

4x mini-DisplayPort

4x DisplayPort

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P620 9.36

Quadro P2200 24.07
+157%

P2200 outperforms P620 by 157% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P620 3624

Quadro P2200 9322
+157%

P2200 outperforms P620 by 157% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P620 11707

Quadro P2200 31445
+169%

P2200 outperforms P620 by 169% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P620 11289

Quadro P2200 30995
+175%

P2200 outperforms P620 by 175% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P620 11727

Quadro P2200 29989
+156%

P2200 outperforms P620 by 156% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−150%

120−130
+150%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−133%

35−40
+133%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −140%	60−65 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −140%	60−65 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −142%	80−85 +142%
Hitman 3	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16 −150%	40−45 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 −140%	60−65 +140%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −140%	60−65 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −142%	80−85 +142%
Hitman 3	24−27 −150%	60−65 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −137%	45−50 +137%
Metro Exodus	17 −135%	40−45 +135%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 −131%	30−33 +131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	32 −150%	80−85 +150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 −150%	50−55 +150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −150%	80−85 +150%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −139%	55−60 +139%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −140%	60−65 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −142%	80−85 +142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 −135%	40−45 +135%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −150%	40−45 +150%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −150%	35−40 +150%
Hitman 3	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −150%	30−33 +150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −133%	35−40 +133%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −135%	40−45 +135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Hitman 3	9−10 −133%	21−24 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −140%	24−27 +140%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −145%	27−30 +145%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −133%	7−8 +133%