Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2200 Quadro P4000 Quadro P5000 Quadro P6000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile Quadro RTX 4000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Max-Q Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh Quadro RTX 5000 X2 Mobile Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.67
+10.1%

P6000 outperforms RTX 5000 Mobile by a moderate 10% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 5000 Mobile RTX 5000 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking105130
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.86no data
Power efficiency10.9922.68
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP102TU104
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38403072
Core clock speed1506 MHz1035 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1545 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8296.6
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS9.492 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs240192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+9.4%
128
−9.4%
1440p90−95
+4.7%
86
−4.7%
4K55−60
+3.8%
53
−3.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.85no data
1440p66.66no data
4K109.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+0%
104
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 125
+0%
125
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+0%
118
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 99
+0%
99
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 73
+0%
73
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 88
+0%
88
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Hitman 3 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+0%
100
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+0%
63
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 66
+0%
66
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Hitman 3 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 90
+0%
90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hitman 3 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50
+0%
50
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 5000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 9% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 5% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 4% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.67 36.03
Recency 1 October 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 110 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 10.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 5000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 4000 Quadro RTX 4000
RTX 5000 Mobile Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile
vs
Pro Vega 64X Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W5700 Radeon Pro W5700
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Tesla K80 Tesla K80
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
XG45
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro 580X Radeon Pro 580X
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 3000 Mobile Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 89 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 34 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.