GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
4050 Max-Q 4050 Mobile 4060 Max-Q 4060 Mobile 4060 Ti Mobile 4070 Max-Q 4070 Mobile 4080 Max-Q 4080 Mobile 4080 Ti Max-Q 4080 Ti Mobile 4090 Max-Q 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
37.13

RTX 4080 Mobile outperforms P6000 by an impressive 60% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14143
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.72no data
Power efficiency11.4141.43
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP102AD104
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38407424
Core clock speed1506 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1665 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt110 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8386.3
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs9680
TMUs240232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cache1.4 MB7.3 MB
L2 Cache3 MB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 37.13
RTX 4080 Mobile 59.33
+59.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15530
Samples: 162
RTX 4080 Mobile 24813
+59.8%
Samples: 3156

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
−66.7%
150
+66.7%
1440p60−65
−65%
99
+65%
4K40−45
−67.5%
67
+67.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p66.66no data
1440p99.98no data
4K149.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 149
+0%
149
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 215
+0%
215
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 143
+0%
143
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 171
+0%
171
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 196
+0%
196
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 124
+0%
124
+0%
Dota 2 178
+0%
178
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 157
+0%
157
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 334
+0%
334
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 121
+0%
121
+0%
Dota 2 165
+0%
165
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 151
+0%
151
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 172
+0%
172
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 149
+0%
149
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 122
+0%
122
+0%
Metro Exodus 102
+0%
102
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140
+0%
140
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+0%
144
+0%
Metro Exodus 67
+0%
67
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117
+0%
117
+0%
Valorant 336
+0%
336
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Dota 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 67% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 65% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4080 Mobile is 68% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.13 59.33
Recency 1 October 2016 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 110 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4080 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 59.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 127.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
RTX 4080 Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W5700X Radeon Pro W5700X
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
ATI WinBoost
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
ATI Video Xpression Xpression
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
ATI WinCharger
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Mobile 5000 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
UHD Graphics 730 730
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Instinct MI300 MI300
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Apple M2 Max 38-Core GPU 38-Core GPU
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Instinct MI325X MI325X
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Instinct MI300A MI300A
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Instinct MI308X MI308X

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 119 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 886 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.