Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
RTX A5000 vs Quadro P5000
Price now
1350$
Games supported
96%
- Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
- Core clock speed 1607 MHz
- Max video memory 16GB
- Memory type GDDR5
- Memory clock speed 9016 MHz
- Maximum resolution
- Interface PCIe 4.0 x16
- Core clock speed
- Max video memory 24 GB
- Memory type GDDR6
- Memory clock speed 16 Gbps
- Maximum resolution
Price now
2393$
Games supported
100%
General info
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance rating | 131 | 16 |
| Value for money | 5.29 | 6.74 |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Ampere (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | GA102 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 1 October 2016 (6 years old) | 12 April 2021 (1 year old) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,499 | no data |
| Current price | $1350 (0.5x MSRP) | $2393 |
Value for money
Technical specs
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 8192 |
| Core clock speed | 1607 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1733 MHz | 1695 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | 28,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 277.3 | 433.9 |
| Floating-point performance | 8,873 gflops | no data |
Dimensions and compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 9016 MHz | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | 768.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | no data |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | no data |
| 3D Stereo | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.6 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | 8.6 |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
- Passmark
- GeekBench 5 OpenCL
- GeekBench 5 Vulkan
- GeekBench 5 CUDA
Passmark
This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 24%
RTX A5000 outperforms Quadro P5000 by 91% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 8%
RTX A5000 outperforms Quadro P5000 by 288% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 5%
RTX A5000 outperforms Quadro P5000 by 143% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
RTX A5000 outperforms Quadro P5000 by 323% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.
Mining hashrates
Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro P5000 and RTX A5000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 21 Mh/s | no data |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.53 kh/s | no data |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 95 | no data |
| 4K | 41 | no data |
Popular games
- Full HD
Low Preset - Full HD
Medium Preset - Full HD
High Preset - Full HD
Ultra Preset - 1440p
High Preset - 1440p
Ultra Preset - 4K
High Preset - 4K
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 | no data |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | no data |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 80−85 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | no data |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
| Hitman 3 | 100−105 | no data |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70 | no data |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | no data |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 | no data |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | no data |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 80−85 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | no data |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
| Hitman 3 | 100−105 | no data |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 65−70 | no data |
| Metro Exodus | 50−55 | no data |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 50−55 | no data |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 70−75 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 98 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 55−60 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 50−55 | no data |
| Battlefield 5 | 95−100 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 80−85 | no data |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 75−80 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 53 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 55−60 | no data |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 50−55 | no data |
| Hitman 3 | 55−60 | no data |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 40−45 | no data |
| Metro Exodus | 30−35 | no data |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 24−27 | no data |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 40−45 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 30−35 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 30−35 | no data |
| Battlefield 5 | 65−70 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 55−60 | no data |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 55−60 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 65−70 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 24−27 | no data |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 24−27 | no data |
| Hitman 3 | 30−35 | no data |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 21−24 | no data |
| Metro Exodus | 20−22 | no data |
| Red Dead Redemption 2 | 16−18 | no data |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 21−24 | no data |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 36 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 21−24 | no data |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 18−20 | no data |
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40 | no data |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 9−10 | no data |
| Far Cry 5 | 27−30 | no data |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 30−35 | no data |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45 | no data |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 14−16 | no data |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 30.86 | 58.96 |
| Recency | 1 October 2016 | 12 April 2021 |
| Memory bus width | 256 | 384 |
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 8192 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 | 768 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 230 Watt |
Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends
since it shows better performance.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Competitors of Quadro P5000 by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to Quadro P5000 by AMD is Radeon Pro 5700, which is slower by 3% and lower by 4 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro P5000:
Competitors of RTX A5000 by AMD
According to our data, the closest equivalent to RTX A5000 by AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 18% and lower by 16 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to RTX A5000:
Similar GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
