GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs Quadro P5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 with GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5000
2016
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
32.78

RTX 3070 Ti outperforms P5000 by an impressive 86% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking17035
Place by popularitynot in top-10087
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.2452.72
Power efficiency12.4914.41
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP104GA104
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)31 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 3070 Ti has 628% better value for money than Quadro P5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20486144
Core clock speed1607 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt290 Watt
Texture fill rate277.3339.8
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS21.75 TFLOPS
ROPs6496
TMUs160192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount16 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz1188 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s608.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5000 32.78
RTX 3070 Ti 60.92
+85.8%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5000 12631
RTX 3070 Ti 23472
+85.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD93
−90.3%
177
+90.3%
1440p50−55
−86%
93
+86%
4K41
−46.3%
60
+46.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p26.87
−694%
3.38
+694%
1440p49.98
−676%
6.44
+676%
4K60.95
−511%
9.98
+511%
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 694% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 676% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti has 511% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−197%
193
+197%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−158%
178
+158%
Atomic Heart 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−43.4%
160−170
+43.4%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−134%
152
+134%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−104%
141
+104%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−105%
205
+105%
Fortnite 140−150
−82.1%
250−260
+82.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−81.7%
210−220
+81.7%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−136%
210
+136%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−45.1%
170−180
+45.1%
Valorant 190−200
−60.6%
300−350
+60.6%
Atomic Heart 85−90
−100%
170−180
+100%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−43.4%
160−170
+43.4%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−102%
131
+102%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−1.1%
270−280
+1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−79.7%
124
+79.7%
Dota 2 130−140
−84.4%
249
+84.4%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−96%
196
+96%
Fortnite 140−150
−82.1%
250−260
+82.1%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−81.7%
210−220
+81.7%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−120%
196
+120%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
−61.7%
173
+61.7%
Metro Exodus 70−75
−107%
145
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−45.1%
170−180
+45.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98
−198%
292
+198%
Valorant 190−200
−60.6%
300−350
+60.6%
Battlefield 5 110−120
−43.4%
160−170
+43.4%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
−75.4%
114
+75.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
−63.8%
113
+63.8%
Dota 2 130−140
−70.4%
230
+70.4%
Far Cry 5 100−105
−83%
183
+83%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
−81.7%
210−220
+81.7%
Forza Horizon 5 85−90
−79.8%
160−170
+79.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
−45.1%
170−180
+45.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
−177%
147
+177%
Valorant 190−200
−60.6%
300−350
+60.6%
Fortnite 140−150
−82.1%
250−260
+82.1%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
−77.8%
45−50
+77.8%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−93.8%
400−450
+93.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
−132%
137
+132%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−107%
89
+107%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
−53.5%
350−400
+53.5%
Battlefield 5 80−85
−68.3%
130−140
+68.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
−121%
73
+121%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−108%
150
+108%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−118%
180−190
+118%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
−85.2%
100−105
+85.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
−130%
120−130
+130%
Fortnite 75−80
−96.1%
150−160
+96.1%
Atomic Heart 24−27
−104%
45−50
+104%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−127%
30−35
+127%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
−141%
147
+141%
Metro Exodus 27−30
−107%
56
+107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−203%
109
+203%
Valorant 180−190
−71.7%
300−350
+71.7%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−6.7%
16
+6.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−133%
35
+133%
Dota 2 90−95
−106%
194
+106%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−116%
82
+116%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
−140%
130−140
+140%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
−77.4%
55−60
+77.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−167%
95−100
+167%
Fortnite 35−40
−119%
75−80
+119%

This is how Quadro P5000 and RTX 3070 Ti compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is 90% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 86% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 Ti is 46% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3070 Ti is 203% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 Ti is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.78 60.92
Recency 1 October 2016 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 290 Watt

Quadro P5000 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 190% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070 Ti, on the other hand, has a 85.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 3070 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6
183 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3
6533 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5000 or GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.