Tesla P4 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with Tesla P4, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.63

Tesla P4 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by an impressive 99% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking410240
Place by popularity98not in top-100
Power efficiency10.7921.47
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP107BGP104
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 September 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402560
Core clock speed1354 MHz886 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1114 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt75 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.72178.2
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS5.704 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs40160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s192.3 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
−91.8%
140−150
+91.8%
Full HD46
−95.7%
90−95
+95.7%
1440p24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
4K15
−80%
27−30
+80%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Battlefield 5 51
−96.1%
100−105
+96.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
−87.5%
75−80
+87.5%
Far Cry 5 39
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−97.4%
75−80
+97.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−81.8%
100−105
+81.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−85.2%
50−55
+85.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−97%
65−70
+97%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
−83.3%
55−60
+83.3%
Battlefield 5 44
−93.2%
85−90
+93.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
Far Cry 5 36
−94.4%
70−75
+94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−92.3%
100−105
+92.3%
Metro Exodus 19
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−89.7%
55−60
+89.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−92.3%
75−80
+92.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Battlefield 5 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
Far Cry 5 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
−97%
65−70
+97%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−89.2%
70−75
+89.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−81.8%
40−45
+81.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−94.4%
35−40
+94.4%
Metro Exodus 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−84.2%
35−40
+84.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−76.5%
30−33
+76.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Battlefield 5 26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%
Far Cry 5 21
−90.5%
40−45
+90.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
−87.5%
45−50
+87.5%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−92.3%
50−55
+92.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
−80%
18−20
+80%
Metro Exodus 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−75%
14−16
+75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−80%
18−20
+80%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−71.4%
12−14
+71.4%
Battlefield 5 13
−84.6%
24−27
+84.6%
Far Cry 5 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
−90.9%
21−24
+90.9%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−80%
27−30
+80%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and Tesla P4 compete in popular games:

  • Tesla P4 is 92% faster in 900p
  • Tesla P4 is 96% faster in 1080p
  • Tesla P4 is 88% faster in 1440p
  • Tesla P4 is 80% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.63 23.13
Recency 3 January 2017 13 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 16 nm

GTX 1050 Mobile has an age advantage of 3 months, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

Tesla P4, on the other hand, has a 98.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The Tesla P4 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while Tesla P4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA Tesla P4
Tesla P4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1230 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 73 votes

Rate Tesla P4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.