Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4000 with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P4000
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.41
+142%

P4000 outperforms Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile by a whopping 142% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking197408
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.61no data
Power efficiency19.69no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792768
Core clock speed1202 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate165.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB3 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan++
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+152%
27−30
−152%

Cost per frame, $

1080p11.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
40−45
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+163%
35−40
−163%
Fortnite 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+147%
45−50
−147%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
Valorant 180−190
+143%
75−80
−143%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+167%
30−33
−167%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
40−45
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+145%
110−120
−145%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Dota 2 130−140
+162%
50−55
−162%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+163%
35−40
−163%
Fortnite 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+147%
45−50
−147%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−105
+150%
40−45
−150%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 77
+157%
30−33
−157%
Valorant 180−190
+143%
75−80
−143%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+168%
40−45
−168%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+176%
21−24
−176%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+158%
24−27
−158%
Dota 2 130−140
+162%
50−55
−162%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+163%
35−40
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+147%
45−50
−147%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+149%
45−50
−149%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
+156%
16−18
−156%
Valorant 180−190
+143%
75−80
−143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+164%
50−55
−164%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+144%
80−85
−144%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+144%
16−18
−144%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+150%
70−75
−150%
Valorant 220−230
+146%
90−95
−146%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+157%
30−33
−157%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+144%
27−30
−144%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+150%
30−33
−150%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+144%
9−10
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+162%
21−24
−162%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Valorant 160−170
+158%
65−70
−158%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+144%
18−20
−144%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Dota 2 85−90
+154%
35−40
−154%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+167%
12−14
−167%

This is how Quadro P4000 and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P4000 is 152% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.41 12.16
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm

Quadro P4000 has a 141.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 272966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 312 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 125 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.