Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro P4000

Place in the ranking	192	402
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	17.45	no data
Power efficiency	19.79	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	no data
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	768
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	1366 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	1442 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	165.8	no data
Floating-point processing power	5.304 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	no data
TMUs	112	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	3 MB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1901 MHz	1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	84 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	no data
Display Port	1.4	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Multi-Projection	no data	+
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	no data
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	6.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

69
+156%

27−30

−156%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

11.81

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +158%	24−27 −158%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +151%	35−40 −151%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +158%	24−27 −158%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +163%	30−33 −163%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +163%	24−27 −163%
Valorant	120−130 +167%	45−50 −167%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +151%	35−40 −151%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +158%	24−27 −158%
Dota 2	100−110 +153%	40−45 −153%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Fortnite	140−150 +160%	55−60 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +163%	30−33 −163%
Grand Theft Auto V	100−105 +150%	40−45 −150%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +157%	30−33 −157%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +151%	70−75 −151%
Red Dead Redemption 2	60−65 +163%	24−27 −163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +153%	40−45 −153%
Valorant	120−130 +167%	45−50 −167%
World of Tanks	270−280 +148%	110−120 −148%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	85−90 +151%	35−40 −151%
Counter-Strike 2	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 +158%	24−27 −158%
Dota 2	100−110 +153%	40−45 −153%
Far Cry 5	85−90 +143%	35−40 −143%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +151%	55−60 −151%
Forza Horizon 5	75−80 +163%	30−33 −163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +151%	70−75 −151%
Valorant	120−130 +167%	45−50 −167%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +152%	21−24 −152%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +150%	70−75 −150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 +180%	10−11 −180%
World of Tanks	190−200 +145%	80−85 −145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	55−60 +146%	24−27 −146%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +160%	10−11 −160%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +166%	35−40 −166%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +177%	30−33 −177%
Forza Horizon 5	45−50 +172%	18−20 −172%
Metro Exodus	65−70 +152%	27−30 −152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%
Valorant	85−90 +146%	35−40 −146%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Dota 2	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Grand Theft Auto V	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +167%	9−10 −167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	90−95 +169%	35−40 −169%
Red Dead Redemption 2	18−20 +171%	7−8 −171%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 +175%	12−14 −175%
Counter-Strike 2	21−24 +163%	8−9 −163%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +175%	4−5 −175%
Dota 2	55−60 +162%	21−24 −162%
Far Cry 5	40−45 +163%	16−18 −163%
Fortnite	35−40 +144%	16−18 −144%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +167%	18−20 −167%
Forza Horizon 5	27−30 +170%	10−11 −170%
Valorant	40−45 +169%	16−18 −169%