GeForce RTX 4090 vs Quadro P3200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.86

RTX 4090 outperforms P3200 by a whopping 337% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2491
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.83
Power efficiency21.0315.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP104AD102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179216384
Core clock speed1328 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz2520 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate172.81,290
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs64176
TMUs112512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount6 GB24 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.18.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.86
RTX 4090 100.00
+337%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8790
RTX 4090 38452
+337%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P3200 16619
RTX 4090 104598
+529%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P3200 45999
RTX 4090 137609
+199%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P3200 12555
RTX 4090 73447
+485%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 82507
RTX 4090 260357
+216%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P3200 419543
RTX 4090 771257
+83.8%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Quadro P3200 82
RTX 4090 310
+280%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Quadro P3200 140
+9.8%
RTX 4090 127

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Quadro P3200 126
+348%
RTX 4090 28

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Quadro P3200 122
RTX 4090 265
+118%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Quadro P3200 107
RTX 4090 120
+11.6%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Quadro P3200 47
RTX 4090 268
+469%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Quadro P3200 59
RTX 4090 437
+641%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Quadro P3200 11
RTX 4090 84
+696%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 3dsmax-05

Quadro P3200 110
RTX 4090 550
+399%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
−204%
258
+204%
1440p45−50
−338%
197
+338%
4K28
−411%
143
+411%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.20
1440pno data8.12
4Kno data11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−405%
212
+405%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−389%
225
+389%
Elden Ring 70−75
−236%
249
+236%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−64.8%
110−120
+64.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−412%
215
+412%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−141%
111
+141%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−466%
555
+466%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−192%
178
+192%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−206%
150−160
+206%
Valorant 90−95
−798%
826
+798%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−64.8%
110−120
+64.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−374%
199
+374%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−133%
107
+133%
Dota 2 40
−400%
200
+400%
Elden Ring 70−75
−532%
468
+532%
Far Cry 5 73
−104%
149
+104%
Fortnite 110−120
−163%
300−350
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−459%
548
+459%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−120%
174
+120%
Metro Exodus 60−65
−200%
183
+200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−45.3%
210−220
+45.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
−206%
150−160
+206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
−138%
170−180
+138%
Valorant 90−95
−743%
750−800
+743%
World of Tanks 240−250
−12.5%
270−280
+12.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
−64.8%
110−120
+64.8%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−340%
185
+340%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
−128%
105
+128%
Dota 2 112
−100%
224
+100%
Far Cry 5 70−75
−193%
210−220
+193%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−455%
544
+455%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
−45.3%
210−220
+45.3%
Valorant 90−95
−639%
680
+639%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 35−40
−338%
162
+338%
Elden Ring 35−40
−779%
343
+779%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−324%
161
+324%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−0.6%
170−180
+0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−343%
90−95
+343%
World of Tanks 150−160
−237%
500−550
+237%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−89.1%
85−90
+89.1%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
−700%
152
+700%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−305%
77
+305%
Far Cry 5 65−70
−146%
160−170
+146%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−745%
507
+745%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−192%
152
+192%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−719%
262
+719%
Valorant 60−65
−853%
572
+853%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−730%
166
+730%
Dota 2 35−40
−379%
187
+379%
Elden Ring 18−20
−1000%
198
+1000%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
−379%
187
+379%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−706%
137
+706%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−203%
200−210
+203%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
−357%
60−65
+357%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−379%
187
+379%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−296%
90−95
+296%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
−650%
150−160
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−471%
40
+471%
Dota 2 35−40
−482%
227
+482%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−250%
100−110
+250%
Fortnite 27−30
−243%
95−100
+243%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−711%
284
+711%
Valorant 27−30
−1155%
364
+1155%

This is how Quadro P3200 and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 204% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 338% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 411% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 is 1155% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed Quadro P3200 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.86 100.00
Recency 21 February 2018 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 450 Watt

Quadro P3200 has 500% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 337.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 300 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15681 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.