Quadro P3200 Max-Q vs P3200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro P3200
2017
6144 MB GDDR5
23.03

P3200 Max-Q outperforms P3200 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking222212
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money3.59no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameN18E-Q1GP104
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date27 February 2017 (7 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)
Current price$2122 no data

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17921792
Core clock speed708 - 1202 MHz1139 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1404 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)78 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate172.8157.2

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P3200 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB6 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz7012 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s168.3 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 23.03
P3200 Max-Q 23.80
+3.3%

P3200 Max-Q outperforms P3200 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P3200 8919
P3200 Max-Q 9218
+3.4%

P3200 Max-Q outperforms P3200 by 3% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+0%
85−90
+0%
4K28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+0%
65−70
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 79
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 95
+0%
95−100
+0%
Hitman 3 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 63
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+1.8%
55−60
−1.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 74
−1.4%
75−80
+1.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 88
−2.3%
90−95
+2.3%
Hitman 3 65−70
−2.9%
70−75
+2.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
−2%
50−55
+2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 53
+6%
50−55
−6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 84
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+0%
40−45
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+1.3%
75−80
−1.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+5.7%
35−40
−5.7%
Far Cry 5 70
+0%
70−75
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+2.9%
70−75
−2.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hitman 3 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 50−55
+2%
50−55
−2%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−2.3%
45−50
+2.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+10%
30−33
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Quadro P3200 and P3200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • P3200 Max-Q is 0% faster than Quadro P3200 in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 3.7% faster than P3200 Max-Q in 4K

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 23.03 23.80
Recency 27 February 2017 21 February 2018
Power consumption (TDP) 78 Watt 75 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro P3200 and Quadro P3200 Max-Q.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 231 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 17 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.