Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Quadro P1000 Quadro P2000 Mobile ... Max-Q Quadro P3000 Mobile ... Max-Q Quadro P3200 ... Max-Q Quadro P4000 Mobile Quadro P4200 Quadro P5000 Mobile Quadro P5200 ... Max-Q
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 ... 80EUs ... 96EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
24.38
+123%

P3200 Max-Q outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225421
Place by popularitynot in top-10035
Power efficiency22.61no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores179296
Core clock speed1139 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1404 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate157.2no data
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1753 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 24.38 10.93
Recency 21 February 2018 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm

P3200 Max-Q has a 123.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 60% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P3200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro W6600M Radeon Pro W6600M
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
RX 560X Mobile Radeon RX 560X Mobile
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
HD 6530M Radeon HD 6530M
vs
HD 6310 Radeon HD 6310
R7 M260X Radeon R7 M260X
vs
Radeon 540X Radeon 540X
R9 270 Radeon R9 270
vs
Graphics 448SP Mobile Radeon Graphics 448SP Mobile
R9 M395X Radeon R9 M395X
vs
RX 6550M Radeon RX 6550M
GTX 1660 Super GeForce GTX 1660 Super
vs
R9 370 1024SP Radeon R9 370 1024SP
R7 M260X Radeon R7 M260X
vs
530X Mobile Radeon 530X Mobile
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GA103 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GA103
Pro 570 Radeon Pro 570
vs
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU M3 Max 40-Core GPU
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 4080 Ti Mobile
R7 M440 Radeon R7 M440
vs
Vega 3 Embedded Radeon Vega 3 Embedded

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 20 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 2403 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.