Arc A370M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	347	387
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.42	26.17
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GP106	DG2-128
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	15 February 2019 (5 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1152	1024
Core clock speed	1291 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1291 MHz	1550 MHz
Number of transistors	4,400 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	92.95	99.20
Floating-point processing power	2.974 TFLOPS	3.174 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	72	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	112.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Mobile 15.11
+18%

Arc A370M 12.80

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Mobile 8387

Arc A370M 12090
+44.1%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Mobile 6847

Arc A370M 8149
+19%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Mobile 43566
+22.4%

Arc A370M 35604

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P2000 Mobile 2046

Arc A370M 3885
+89.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 +5.3%	38 −5.3%
1440p	24−27 +14.3%	21 −14.3%
4K	45−50 +12.5%	40 −12.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +0%	46 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 +0%	19 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	74 +0%	74 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	13 +0%	13 +0%
Dota 2	42 +0%	42 +0%
Far Cry 5	24 +0%	24 +0%
Fortnite	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +0%	62 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	29 +0%	29 +0%
Metro Exodus	13 +0%	13 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
World of Tanks	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	11 +0%	11 +0%
Dota 2	66 +0%	66 +0%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	53 +0%	53 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Valorant	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	11 +0%	11 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	11 +0%	11 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−105 +0%	100−105 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
World of Tanks	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	37 +0%	37 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Valorant	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	40 +0%	40 +0%
Far Cry 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Fortnite	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Valorant	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how P2000 Mobile and Arc A370M compete in popular games:

P2000 Mobile is 5% faster in 1080p
P2000 Mobile is 14% faster in 1440p
P2000 Mobile is 13% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.11	12.80
Recency	15 February 2019	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	3.75 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	35 Watt

P2000 Mobile has a 18% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc A370M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 6.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc A370M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Arc A370M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.