Arc A530M vs Quadro P2000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P1000 P2000 Mobile P2000 Max-Q P3000 Mobile P3200 P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
A350M A370M A380M A530M A550M A570M A730M A770M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Mobile with Arc A530M, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Mobile
2019
3.75 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.32

A530M outperforms P2000 Mobile by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P2000 Mobile P2000 Mobile
Arc A530M Arc A530M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking395315
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency14.3022.33
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP106DG2-256
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date15 February 2019 (6 years ago)1 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11521536
Core clock speed1291 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1291 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate92.95124.8
Floating-point processing power2.974 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs7296
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L1 Cache432 KBno data
L2 Cache1280 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount3.75 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 13.32 18.03
Recency 15 February 2019 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 3.75 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

Arc A530M has a 35.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 113.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 166.7% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc A530M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
Quadro P2000 Mobile
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
vs
Pro 5300M Radeon Pro 5300M
Arc A530M Arc A530M
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
P2000 Mobile Quadro P2000 Mobile
vs
M4000M Quadro M4000M
Ice Lake GT3e Intel Ice Lake GT3e
vs
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
Tesla K80 NVIDIA Tesla K80
vs
RX 460 RX 460
Tesla K80 NVIDIA Tesla K80
vs
8600M GT Mac Edition GeForce 8600M GT Mac Edition
Tesla K40d NVIDIA Tesla K40d
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
HD 7350 OEM PCI AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM PCI
vs
CMP 40HX CMP 40HX
Radeon 550 AMD Radeon 550
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
GTX 1650 Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
K2100M Quadro K2100M
RTX 4000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 Mobile
vs
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
RTX 3000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
Threads MTT S4000
RTX 3000 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile PRO 4000 Blackwell Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.1 125 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 214 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 Mobile or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.