Arc B580 vs Quadro P1000

Place in the ranking	421	107
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.70	93.57
Power efficiency	20.06	14.57
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Xe2 (2025)
GPU code name	GP107	BMG-G21
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 February 2017 (8 years ago)	16 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Arc B580 has 1542% better value for money than Quadro P1000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	2560
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	2670 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	2670 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.61	427.2
Floating-point processing power	1.555 TFLOPS	13.67 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	80
TMUs	32	160
Tensor Cores	no data	160
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	20

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	145 mm	272 mm
Width	MXM Module	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	2375 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	456.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Portable Device Dependent	1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.7	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.4
CUDA	6.1	-
DLSS	-	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 11.53

Arc B580 39.77
+245%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4480

Arc B580 15448
+245%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 −172%	125 +172%
1440p	18−21 −289%	70 +289%
4K	11 −282%	42 +282%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	8.15 −309%	1.99 +309%
1440p	20.83 −486%	3.56 +486%
4K	34.09 −475%	5.93 +475%

Arc B580 has 309% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Arc B580 has 486% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Arc B580 has 475% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −615%	143 +615%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −179%	100−110 +179%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −485%	117 +485%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −243%	100−110 +243%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −200%	95−100 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
Valorant	45−50 −250%	160−170 +250%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −179%	100−110 +179%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −420%	104 +420%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
Dota 2	40−45 −233%	140 +233%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Fortnite	41 −327%	170−180 +327%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −243%	100−110 +243%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 −233%	140−150 +233%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −12.5%	36 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	103 −96.1%	200−210 +96.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −163%	75−80 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 −311%	140−150 +311%
Valorant	45−50 −250%	160−170 +250%
World of Tanks	160−170 −72.2%	270−280 +72.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −179%	100−110 +179%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 −375%	95 +375%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −226%	75−80 +226%
Dota 2	40−45 −233%	140−150 +233%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −120%	95−100 +120%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −226%	150−160 +226%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 −243%	100−110 +243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −130%	200−210 +130%
Valorant	45−50 −250%	160−170 +250%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −117%	24−27 +117%
Dota 2	16−18 −331%	69 +331%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 −241%	290−300 +241%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −300%	40−45 +300%
World of Tanks	80−85 −208%	250−260 +208%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −222%	70−75 +222%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −400%	130−140 +400%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −233%	90−95 +233%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 −272%	65−70 +272%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −263%	85−90 +263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Valorant	27−30 −341%	120−130 +341%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Dota 2	21−24 −255%	78 +255%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −241%	75−80 +241%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −557%	46 +557%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 −285%	130−140 +285%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −271%	24−27 +271%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −241%	75−80 +241%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −370%	45−50 +370%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −250%	14 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Dota 2	21−24 −241%	75−80 +241%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Fortnite	12−14 −346%	55−60 +346%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −244%	55−60 +244%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 −375%	35−40 +375%
Valorant	12−14 −467%	65−70 +467%

This is how Quadro P1000 and Arc B580 compete in popular games:

Arc B580 is 172% faster in 1080p
Arc B580 is 289% faster in 1440p
Arc B580 is 282% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Arc B580 is 615% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Arc B580 surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 45 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.53	39.77
Recency	7 February 2017	16 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	190 Watt

Quadro P1000 has 375% lower power consumption.

Arc B580, on the other hand, has a 244.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc B580 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc B580 is a desktop one.