RTX A1000 Mobile vs Quadro M5000M

Place in performance ranking	288	222
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	7.75	no data
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM204	GA107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price	$468	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,536	2048
Core clock speed	962 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1051 MHz	1140 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	93.60	72.96
Floating-point performance	2,995 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M5000M and RTX A1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	176.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.0	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.2	8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 17.88

RTX A1000 Mobile 23.07
+29%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M5000M by 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M5000M 11845

RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+27.8%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M5000M by 28% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M5000M 9228

RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+22.7%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M5000M by 23% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M5000M 63738

RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+11.2%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M5000M by 11% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	80 +23.1%	65 −23.1%
1440p	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

27−30

−118%

61
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −66.7%	50 +66.7%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −28.8%	75−80 +28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −30.8%	50−55 +30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −78.6%	50 +78.6%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −19.1%	55−60 +19.1%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −26%	60−65 +26%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −25.4%	70−75 +25.4%
Hitman 3	40−45 −100%	84 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −32.8%	75−80 +32.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −25.9%	65−70 +25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −26.5%	60−65 +26.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −114%	109 +114%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −87.9%	62 +87.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −10%	33 +10%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −28.8%	75−80 +28.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −30.8%	50−55 +30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −32.1%	37 +32.1%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −53.2%	72 +53.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	50−55 −26%	60−65 +26%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −25.4%	70−75 +25.4%
Hitman 3	40−45 −33.3%	55−60 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −32.8%	75−80 +32.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −25.9%	65−70 +25.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −26.5%	60−65 +26.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 +15.9%	44 −15.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	67 −26.9%	85 +26.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −63.6%	54 +63.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	35−40 −25%	45−50 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 +20%	25 −20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −30.8%	50−55 +30.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −3.6%	29 +3.6%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −19.1%	55−60 +19.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −25.4%	70−75 +25.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −32.8%	75−80 +32.8%
Metro Exodus	50−55 −25.9%	65−70 +25.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	38 −13.2%	43 +13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 +26.9%	26 −26.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

45−50

−26.5%

60−65
+26.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −29.4%	40−45 +29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −37.1%	45−50 +37.1%
Hitman 3	24−27 −26.9%	30−35 +26.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −30.8%	16−18 +30.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −31.6%	24−27 +31.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −37.5%	22 +37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −34.8%	30−35 +34.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −40%	14−16 +40%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −31.4%	45−50 +31.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −30.6%	45−50 +30.6%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −33.3%	40−45 +33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −42.9%	50−55 +42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −42.1%	27−30 +42.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −41.7%	17 +41.7%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	35−40 −22.2%	40−45 +22.2%
Far Cry New Dawn	18−20 −36.8%	24−27 +36.8%
Hitman 3	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −45.5%	16−18 +45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −38.9%	24−27 +38.9%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 −27.3%	14−16 +27.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9−10 −33.3%	12−14 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	20−22 −35%	27−30 +35%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −38.5%	18−20 +38.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	20−22 −30%	24−27 +30%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −29.4%	21−24 +29.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18

−25%

20−22
+25%

This is how M5000M and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

M5000M is 23% faster in 1080p
RTX A1000 Mobile is 39% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M5000M is 27% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 118% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

M5000M is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
RTX A1000 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	17.88	23.07
Recency	2 October 2015	30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	95 Watt