RTX A1000 Mobile vs Quadro M2200

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro M2200
2017
4GB GDDR5
11.06

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking392223
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.02no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN17P-Q3GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date13 January 2017 (7 years ago)30 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$1967 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed694 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1038 MHz1140 MHz
Number of transistors1870 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate66.3072.96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2200 and RTX A1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5508 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s176.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.28.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.06
RTX A1000 Mobile 23.07
+109%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 109% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 24622
RTX A1000 Mobile 58312
+137%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 137% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro M2200 7372
RTX A1000 Mobile 15135
+105%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 105% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 5850
RTX A1000 Mobile 11321
+93.5%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 94% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro M2200 37796
RTX A1000 Mobile 70880
+87.5%

RTX A1000 Mobile outperforms Quadro M2200 by 88% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD45
−51.1%
68
+51.1%
1440p12−14
−125%
27
+125%
4K14
−92.9%
27−30
+92.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−259%
61
+259%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−100%
45−50
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−194%
50
+194%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−194%
50
+194%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−204%
85
+204%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
Hitman 3 27−30
−190%
84
+190%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−196%
68
+196%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−210%
62
+210%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−100%
45−50
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−94.1%
33
+94.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
−107%
60−65
+107%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−118%
37
+118%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−182%
79
+182%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
Hitman 3 27−30
−138%
69
+138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−130%
53
+130%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−141%
41
+141%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
−117%
50−55
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
−130%
85
+130%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−170%
54
+170%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
−100%
45−50
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−47.1%
25
+47.1%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−70.6%
29
+70.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−161%
73
+161%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−100%
75−80
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−115%
43
+115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 20−22
−30%
26
+30%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−119%
35−40
+119%
Hitman 3 16−18
−141%
41
+141%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−124%
38
+124%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−167%
24
+167%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−114%
30−33
+114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−127%
24−27
+127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−214%
22
+214%
Battlefield 5 20−22
−155%
50−55
+155%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−180%
14−16
+180%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−117%
35−40
+117%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−132%
40−45
+132%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−135%
45−50
+135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−183%
17
+183%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Hitman 3 10−11
−120%
21−24
+120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−66.7%
14−16
+66.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−250%
14−16
+250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−100%
12−14
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−167%
16−18
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−92.3%
24−27
+92.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
−140%
12−14
+140%
Battlefield 5 10−11
−170%
27−30
+170%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−100%
21−24
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−136%
30−35
+136%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
−150%
10−11
+150%

This is how Quadro M2200 and RTX A1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 51.1% faster than Quadro M2200 in 1080p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 125% faster than Quadro M2200 in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 Mobile is 92.9% faster than Quadro M2200 in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A1000 Mobile is 400% faster than the Quadro M2200.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX A1000 Mobile surpassed Quadro M2200 in all 68 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.06 23.07
Recency 13 January 2017 30 March 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 95 Watt

The RTX A1000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile
RTX A1000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 282 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 81 vote

Rate RTX A1000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.