Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro M4000M

Place in performance ranking	313	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	61
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.45	100.00
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM204	Navi 10
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	7 July 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399
Current price	$832	$111 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 2799% better value for money than M4000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1,280	2560
Core clock speed	975 MHz	1605 MHz
Boost clock speed	1013 MHz	1905 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	78.00	304.8
Floating-point performance	2,496 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M4000M and Radeon RX 5700 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	272 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	160 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Multi Monitor	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	+
CUDA	5.2	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M4000M 16.00

RX 5700 XT 43.05
+169%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 169% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M4000M 6185

RX 5700 XT 16642
+169%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 169% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M4000M 10259

RX 5700 XT 35823
+249%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 249% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 7723

RX 5700 XT 26189
+239%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 239% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M4000M 49204

RX 5700 XT 146093
+197%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 197% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 56

RX 5700 XT 115
+106%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 106% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 89

RX 5700 XT 110
+24.2%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 24% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 110
+155%

RX 5700 XT 43

Quadro M4000M outperforms Radeon RX 5700 XT by 155% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 80

RX 5700 XT 174
+119%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 119% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 68

RX 5700 XT 81
+18.3%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 18% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 27

RX 5700 XT 47
+72.4%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 72% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 45

RX 5700 XT 141
+217%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 217% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M4000M 7

RX 5700 XT 13
+95.4%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 95% in SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M4000M 45

RX 5700 XT 138
+210%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 210% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M4000M 80

RX 5700 XT 159
+99.7%

Radeon RX 5700 XT outperforms Quadro M4000M by 100% in SPECviewperf 12 - Catia.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	60 −103%	122 +103%
1440p	27−30 −185%	77 +185%
4K	20 −150%	50 +150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

24−27

−212%

78
+212%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −130%	76 +130%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −307%	110 +307%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −283%	199 +283%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −237%	118 +237%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −212%	78 +212%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −191%	125 +191%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −162%	118 +162%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −192%	155 +192%
Hitman 3	35−40 −365%	172 +365%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −379%	249 +379%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −200%	144 +200%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −161%	115 +161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −420%	234 +420%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −317%	121 +317%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −112%	70 +112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −237%	91 +237%
Battlefield 5	50−55 −217%	165 +217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −266%	128 +266%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −200%	75 +200%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −32.6%	57 +32.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	45−50 −184%	128 +184%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −191%	154 +191%
Hitman 3	35−40 −141%	89 +141%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −288%	202 +288%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −210%	149 +210%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −161%	115 +161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −242%	154 +242%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −353%	154 +353%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −266%	106 +266%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 −87.9%	62 +87.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	27−30 −189%	78 +189%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −129%	80 +129%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −168%	67 +168%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −69.8%	73 +69.8%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 −179%	148 +179%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 −160%	135 +160%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −102%	97 +102%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 −174%	93 +174%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −131%	67 +131%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−145%

108
+145%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −306%	126 +306%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −290%	117 +290%
Hitman 3	21−24 −217%	73 +217%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −250%	42 +250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 −212%	53 +212%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −354%	59 +354%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −290%	78 +290%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −344%	40 +344%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −273%	97 +273%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −284%	119 +284%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −225%	104 +225%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −259%	104 +259%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−33 −297%	119 +297%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −276%	60−65 +276%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −360%	46 +360%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	30−35 −29.4%	44 +29.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −306%	65 +306%
Hitman 3	12−14 −275%	45 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −229%	55−60 +229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −290%	39 +290%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −260%	54 +260%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −289%	35 +289%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8−9 −313%	33 +313%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −253%	60 +253%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −336%	48 +336%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −467%	17 +467%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −276%	79 +276%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 −271%	63 +271%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −273%	56 +273%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −117%	13 +117%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−186%

40
+186%

This is how M4000M and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

RX 5700 XT is 103% faster in 1080p
RX 5700 XT is 185% faster in 1440p
RX 5700 XT is 150% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5700 XT is 467% faster than the M4000M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5700 XT surpassed M4000M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.00	43.05
Recency	2 October 2015	7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	225 Watt