UHD Graphics vs Quadro M3000M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M3000M with UHD Graphics, including specs and performance data.

M3000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
14.00
+160%

M3000M outperforms UHD Graphics by a whopping 160% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking375621
Place by popularitynot in top-1005
Power efficiency13.2038.05
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameGM204Jasper Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,024256
Core clock speed1050 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rate67.2012.00
Floating-point processing power2.15 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M3000M 14.00
+160%
UHD Graphics 5.38

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M3000M 5595
+160%
UHD Graphics 2151

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60
+186%
21−24
−186%
4K25
+178%
9−10
−178%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Fortnite 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Valorant 110−120
+188%
40−45
−188%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+181%
27−30
−181%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+167%
70−75
−167%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Dota 2 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Fortnite 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+169%
16−18
−169%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+172%
18−20
−172%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42
+163%
16−18
−163%
Valorant 110−120
+188%
40−45
−188%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Dota 2 85−90
+193%
30−33
−193%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+181%
16−18
−181%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+175%
8−9
−175%
Valorant 110−120
+188%
40−45
−188%
Fortnite 75−80
+189%
27−30
−189%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+189%
9−10
−189%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
+189%
35−40
−189%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+175%
8−9
−175%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+183%
6−7
−183%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+176%
45−50
−176%
Valorant 140−150
+184%
50−55
−184%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+164%
14−16
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+190%
10−11
−190%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+175%
12−14
−175%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Fortnite 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 35
+192%
12−14
−192%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+180%
5−6
−180%
Valorant 70−75
+174%
27−30
−174%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Dota 2 45−50
+172%
18−20
−172%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
Fortnite 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how M3000M and UHD Graphics compete in popular games:

  • M3000M is 186% faster in 1080p
  • M3000M is 178% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.00 5.38
Recency 18 August 2015 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 10 Watt

M3000M has a 160.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 650% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M3000M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M3000M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M3000M
Quadro M3000M
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8
360 votes

Rate Quadro M3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3
7506 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M3000M or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.