Radeon Pro 5300M vs Quadro M2000M

Place in performance ranking	454	322
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.50	3.75
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GM107	Navi 14
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$363	$2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro 5300M has 50% better value for money than M2000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1280
Core clock speed	1038 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1197 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	65 Watt
Texture fill rate	43.92	100.0
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000M and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.94

Pro 5300M 15.44
+72.7%

Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms Quadro M2000M by 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M2000M 3455

Pro 5300M 5966
+72.7%

Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms Quadro M2000M by 73% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	32 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%
4K	11 −63.6%	18−20 +63.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−71.4%

24−27
+71.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −80%	35−40 +80%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −68%	40−45 +68%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −69.8%	70−75 +69.8%
Hitman 3	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −59%	60−65 +59%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −88.9%	50−55 +88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −75%	45−50 +75%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −85.2%	50−55 +85.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −80%	35−40 +80%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −68%	40−45 +68%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −69.8%	70−75 +69.8%
Hitman 3	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −59%	60−65 +59%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −88.9%	50−55 +88.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −72%	40−45 +72%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −75%	45−50 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23 −43.5%	30−35 +43.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −100%	24−27 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −72.2%	30−35 +72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −71.4%	24−27 +71.4%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −80%	35−40 +80%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −69.8%	70−75 +69.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −59%	60−65 +59%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −75%	45−50 +75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 −136%	30−35 +136%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−72%

40−45
+72%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −76.5%	30−33 +76.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −107%	27−30 +107%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −77.8%	16−18 +77.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −225%	12−14 +225%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −72.7%	18−20 +72.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −87.5%	30−33 +87.5%
Hitman 3	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −63.2%	30−35 +63.2%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −125%	27−30 +125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −180%	27−30 +180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −100%	16−18 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−66.7%

24−27
+66.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Hitman 3	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −80%	9−10 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −100%	8−9 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −90.9%	21−24 +90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −88.9%	16−18 +88.9%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −66.7%	14−16 +66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −100%	6−7 +100%