NVIDIA started Quadro M2000M sales 2 October 2015. This is a Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 5 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 55 Watt.

General info

Some basic facts about Quadro M2000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in performance ranking	450
Place by popularity	not in top-100
Value for money	2.36
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code name	GM107
Market segment	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Current price	$363	of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Technical specs

Quadro M2000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro M2000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT)
Core clock speed	1038 MHz	of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Boost clock speed	1197 MHz	of 3599 (Radeon RX 7990 XTX)
Number of transistors	1,870 million	of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1070 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	of 4 (Radeon 780M)
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem)
Texture fill rate	43.92	of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB)
Floating-point performance	1,405 gflops	of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro M2000M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors	None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro M2000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory type	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X)
Memory bus width	128 Bit	of 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz	of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER)
Memory bandwidth	80 GB/s	of 3276 (Aldebaran)
Shared memory	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro M2000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display Connectors	No outputs
Display Port	1.2

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro M2000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+
3D Vision Pro	+
Mosaic	+
nView Display Management	+
Optimus	+

API support

APIs supported by Quadro M2000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX	12
Shader Model	5.0
OpenGL	4.5	of 4.6 (GeForce RTX 4090)
OpenCL	1.2
Vulkan	+
CUDA	5.0

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro M2000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.95

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

M2000M 3466

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M2000M 20567

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

M2000M 5143

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M2000M 4157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

M2000M 29795

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

M2000M 9552

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

M2000M 9185

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M2000M 10438

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

M2000M 53

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 70

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 33

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 medical-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

Benchmark coverage: 3%

M2000M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 70

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 33

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

Benchmark coverage: 2%

M2000M 3.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro M2000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36
4K	11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14
Battlefield 5	30−33
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Far Cry 5	21−24
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24
Forza Horizon 4	30−35
Hitman 3	21−24
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14
Battlefield 5	30−33
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Far Cry 5	21−24
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24
Forza Horizon 4	30−35
Hitman 3	21−24
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20
Metro Exodus	12−14
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18−20
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	23
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14
Battlefield 5	30−33
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16
Far Cry 5	21−24
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24
Forza Horizon 4	30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14
Hitman 3	14−16
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16
Metro Exodus	7−8
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	14−16
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5
Far Cry 5	14−16
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16
Forza Horizon 4	16−18
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7
Hitman 3	8−9
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9
Metro Exodus	3−4
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5
Battlefield 5	6−7
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2
Far Cry 5	7−8
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11
Forza Horizon 4	10−12
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3

Relative performance

Overall Quadro M2000M performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.

Quadro P620 104.47

Radeon Pro 560 100.22

Quadro K2200M 100

Quadro M2000M 100

Quadro T500 Mobile 99.66

Radeon Pro 460 99.55

Quadro P600 94.41

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro M2000M is Radeon Pro 560, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 2 positions in our ranking.