Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs Quadro K620M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K620M and RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro K620M
2015
2 GB DDR3, 30 Watt
3.02
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
2024
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
27.26
+803%

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile outperforms K620M by a whopping 803% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking765198
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.9753.94
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM108AD107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2015 (9 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3842048
Core clock speed1029 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate17.98129.6
Floating-point processing power0.8632 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620M 3.02
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.26
+803%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro K620M 2434
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239
+732%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro K620M 7880
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+741%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro K620M 1621
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136
+772%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21
−757%
180−190
+757%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Hitman 3 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−770%
200−210
+770%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Hitman 3 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−770%
200−210
+770%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−789%
80−85
+789%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Far Cry 5 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−775%
140−150
+775%
Hitman 3 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−770%
200−210
+770%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−733%
100−105
+733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−757%
120−130
+757%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−797%
350−400
+797%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−757%
60−65
+757%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−800%
45−50
+800%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%
Hitman 3 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−775%
70−75
+775%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−733%
50−55
+733%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%

This is how Quadro K620M and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 757% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.02 27.26
Recency 1 March 2015 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro K620M has 16.7% lower power consumption.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has a 802.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Quadro K620M
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 5 votes

Rate Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 13 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.