NVIDIA Quadro K620M: specs and benchmarks

NVIDIA started Quadro K620M sales 1 March 2015. This is Maxwell architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 1.8 GHz are supplied, and together with 64 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 14.4 GB / s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 30 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.84 percent of a leader's which is NVIDIA TITAN RTX.

Of Quadro K620M's architecture, market type and release date.

Quadro K620M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K620M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Information on Quadro K620M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K620M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K620M.

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K620M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

APIs supported by Quadro K620M, sometimes including their particular versions.

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K620M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K620M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Let's see how good Quadro K620M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Comparisons with system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.