NVIDIA Quadro K620M vs AMD FirePro W4190M

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 59%
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Buy
  • Interface MXM-A (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 1029
  • Max video memory 2GB
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 2000
  • Maximum resolution
AMD FirePro W4190M
FirePro W4190M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x8
  • Core clock speed 825
  • Max video memory 2048 MB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 4000
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 4205$
Games supported 59%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating656665
Value for moneyno data0.03
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)GCN (2011−2017)
GPU code nameGM108Mars XTX?
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date1 March 2015 (7 years ago)12 November 2015 (7 years ago)
Current priceno data$4205
Value for money

To calculate the index we compare the characteristics of graphics cards against their prices.

no data
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384384
Core clock speed1029 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistorsno data950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate17.9821.60
Floating-point performance863.2 gflops691.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K620M and FirePro W4190M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data+
Optimus+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Model55.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620M 2.97
+2.8%
W4190M 2.89
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

Quadro K620M 1158
+2.7%
W4190M 1128

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Quadro K620M 2434
+3.5%
W4190M 2351

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro K620M 9092
W4190M 12317
+35.5%

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro K620M 1424
W4190M 1663
+16.8%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Quadro K620M 1621
W4190M 1745
+7.6%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro K620M 6165
+8.1%
W4190M 5705

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K620M and FirePro W4190M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 92 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD22
+100%
11
−100%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+9.1%
10−12
−9.1%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hitman 3 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 2.97 2.89
Recency 1 March 2015 12 November 2015
Memory bus width 64 128
Memory bandwidth 14.4 64

Technical City couldn't decide between

NVIDIA Quadro K620M
NVIDIA Quadro K620M

and

AMD FirePro W4190M
AMD FirePro W4190M

The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro K620M by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro K620M from AMD is FirePro W4190M, which is slower by 3% and lower by 9 positions in our rating.

AMD FirePro W4190M FirePro W4190M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K620M:

NVIDIA Quadro K620M 100

Competitors of FirePro W4190M by NVIDIA

We believe that the nearest equivalent to FirePro W4190M from NVIDIA is Quadro M500M, which is nearly equal in speed and higher by 1 position in our rating.

NVIDIA Quadro M500M Quadro M500M
Compare

Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to FirePro W4190M:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 ratings

Rate NVIDIA Quadro K620M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 6 ratings

Rate AMD FirePro W4190M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.