Arc A770 vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K6000 with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K6000
2013
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
20.85

Arc A770 outperforms Quadro K6000 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking245193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.9811.46
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Alchemist
GPU code nameGK110BDG2-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 $329
Current price$429 (0.1x MSRP)$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K6000 has 5% better value for money than Arc A770.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28804096
Core clock speed797 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate216.5614.4
Floating-point performance5,196 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed6008 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA3.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K6000 20.85
Arc A770 25.85
+24%

Arc A770 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K6000 8052
Arc A770 9984
+24%

Arc A770 outperforms Quadro K6000 by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
−28.2%
109
+28.2%
1440p50−55
−34%
67
+34%
4K30−35
−40%
42
+40%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 92
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Forza Horizon 4 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Hitman 3 50−55
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 203
−23.2%
250−260
+23.2%
Metro Exodus 144
−18.1%
170−180
+18.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 304
−15.1%
350−400
+15.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 102
−17.6%
120−130
+17.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
−20.3%
95−100
+20.3%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−17.6%
100−105
+17.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
−19.4%
80−85
+19.4%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
−17.1%
130−140
+17.1%
Hitman 3 50−55
−15.4%
60−65
+15.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
−17.6%
120−130
+17.6%
Metro Exodus 129
−16.3%
150−160
+16.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 258
−16.3%
300−310
+16.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
−22.4%
240−250
+22.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−23.3%
90−95
+23.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45
−22.2%
55−60
+22.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
−22.6%
65−70
+22.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−19%
50−55
+19%
Far Cry 5 55−60
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 23
−17.4%
27−30
+17.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
−24%
150−160
+24%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 216
−20.4%
260−270
+20.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
−18.1%
85−90
+18.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 74
−21.6%
90−95
+21.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
−17.6%
80−85
+17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 133
−20.3%
160−170
+20.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60
−16.7%
70−75
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Far Cry 5 82
−22%
100−105
+22%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Hitman 3 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100
−20%
120−130
+20%
Metro Exodus 91
−20.9%
110−120
+20.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 158
−20.3%
190−200
+20.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
−16.7%
70−75
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 59
−18.6%
70−75
+18.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−16.3%
50−55
+16.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−20%
30−33
+20%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Hitman 3 20−22
−20%
24−27
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 49
−22.4%
60−65
+22.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
−23.3%
90−95
+23.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
−16.7%
35−40
+16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
−18.4%
45−50
+18.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−20%
18−20
+20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
−23.1%
80−85
+23.1%
Metro Exodus 56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%

This is how Quadro K6000 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 28% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 34% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 40% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.85 25.85
Recency 23 July 2013 12 October 2022
Cost $5265 $329
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 106 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 5116 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.