Arc A770 vs Tesla K40m

Place in performance ranking	469	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.11	11.46
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Alchemist
GPU code name	GK110B	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 November 2013 (10 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$7,699	$329
Current price	$744 (0.1x MSRP)	$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 932% better value for money than Tesla K40m.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2880	4096
Core clock speed	745 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	210.2	614.4
Floating-point performance	4,291 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.4 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	3.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Tesla K40m 8.50

Arc A770 25.85
+204%

Arc A770 outperforms Tesla K40m by 204% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Tesla K40m 3281

Arc A770 9984
+204%

Arc A770 outperforms Tesla K40m by 204% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 −211%	109 +211%
1440p	21−24 −219%	67 +219%
4K	12−14 −250%	42 +250%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14

−250%

40−45
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 −210%	65 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −207%	92 +207%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −215%	85−90 +215%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −231%	50−55 +231%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −228%	55−60 +228%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −219%	65−70 +219%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −230%	33 +230%
Hitman 3	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 −212%	203 +212%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −220%	144 +220%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −224%	65−70 +224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95−100 −220%	304 +220%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−33 −240%	102 +240%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −211%	56 +211%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 −229%	79 +229%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −215%	85−90 +215%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −231%	50−55 +231%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −228%	55−60 +228%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 −219%	65−70 +219%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −217%	110−120 +217%
Hitman 3	16−18 −225%	50−55 +225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −240%	100−110 +240%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −223%	129 +223%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 −224%	65−70 +224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 −223%	258 +223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 −227%	196 +227%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −204%	70−75 +204%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −221%	45 +221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −243%	72 +243%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −231%	50−55 +231%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −250%	40−45 +250%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −228%	55−60 +228%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −229%	23 +229%
Horizon Zero Dawn	35−40 −246%	121 +246%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −209%	216 +209%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −243%	72 +243%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 −208%	74 +208%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−224%

65−70
+224%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −206%	45−50 +206%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −233%	133 +233%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −233%	40 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −233%	60 +233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −240%	16−18 +240%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −242%	82 +242%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Hitman 3	10−11 −210%	30−35 +210%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −233%	100 +233%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −237%	91 +237%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −216%	158 +216%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −233%	60 +233%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −228%	59 +228%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−207%

40−45
+207%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Hitman 3	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −233%	30−33 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −206%	49 +206%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −204%	73 +204%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −217%	38 +217%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −250%	14−16 +250%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −300%	8 +300%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −210%	65 +210%
Metro Exodus	18−20 −211%	56 +211%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −208%	37 +208%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

7−8
−214%

21−24

+214%

This is how Tesla K40m and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 211% faster in 1080p
Arc A770 is 219% faster in 1440p
Arc A770 is 250% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.50	25.85
Recency	22 November 2013	12 October 2022
Cost	$7699	$329
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	245 Watt	225 Watt