Arc A770 vs Quadro K5200

Place in performance ranking	320	193
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	6.36	11.46
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Alchemist
GPU code name	GK110B	DG2-512
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	12 October 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$1,699.74	$329
Current price	$451 (0.3x MSRP)	$597 (1.8x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Arc A770 has 80% better value for money than Quadro K5200.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2304	4096
Core clock speed	667 MHz	2100 MHz
Boost clock speed	771 MHz	2400 MHz
Number of transistors	7,080 million	21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt
Texture fill rate	148.0	614.4
Floating-point performance	3,553 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz	16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192.3 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	3.5	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K5200 15.64

Arc A770 25.85
+65.3%

Arc A770 outperforms Quadro K5200 by 65% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K5200 6041

Arc A770 9984
+65.3%

Arc A770 outperforms Quadro K5200 by 65% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65−70 −67.7%	109 +67.7%
1440p	40−45 −67.5%	67 +67.5%
4K	24−27 −75%	42 +75%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−54.8%

65−70
+54.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	65 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	92 −63%	150−160 +63%
Battlefield 5	85−90 −64.7%	140−150 +64.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −60.4%	85−90 +60.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −61%	95−100 +61%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Forza Horizon 4	33 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Hitman 3	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	203 −47.8%	300−310 +47.8%
Metro Exodus	144 −59.7%	230−240 +59.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	304 −64.5%	500−550 +64.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	102 −56.9%	160−170 +56.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −60.7%	90−95 +60.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	79 −64.6%	130−140 +64.6%
Battlefield 5	85−90 −64.7%	140−150 +64.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −60.4%	85−90 +60.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −61%	95−100 +61%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 −64.2%	110−120 +64.2%
Forza Horizon 4	110−120 −62.2%	180−190 +62.2%
Hitman 3	50−55 −63.5%	85−90 +63.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100−110 −56.9%	160−170 +56.9%
Metro Exodus	129 −62.8%	210−220 +62.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 −61.8%	110−120 +61.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	258 −55%	400−450 +55%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	196 −53.1%	300−310 +53.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	70−75 −64.4%	120−130 +64.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	45 −55.6%	70−75 +55.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	72 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 −60.4%	85−90 +60.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −54.8%	65−70 +54.8%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −61%	95−100 +61%
Forza Horizon 4	23 −52.2%	35−40 +52.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn	121 −57%	190−200 +57%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	216 −62%	350−400 +62%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 −52.8%	110−120 +52.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	74 −62.2%	120−130 +62.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70
−61.8%

110−120

+61.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −63.3%	80−85 +63.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	133 −57.9%	210−220 +57.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 −62.5%	65−70 +62.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −58.3%	95−100 +58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −57.1%	55−60 +57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −58.8%	27−30 +58.8%
Far Cry 5	82 −58.5%	130−140 +58.5%
Forza Horizon 4	15 −60%	24−27 +60%
Hitman 3	30−35 −61.3%	50−55 +61.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	100 −60%	160−170 +60%
Metro Exodus	91 −64.8%	150−160 +64.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	158 −64.6%	260−270 +64.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 −58.3%	95−100 +58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	59 −61%	95−100 +61%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

40−45

−62.8%

70−75
+62.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −60%	40−45 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Hitman 3	20−22 −50%	30−33 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −50%	45−50 +50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	49 −63.3%	80−85 +63.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	73 −64.4%	120−130 +64.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30 −50%	45−50 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 −57.9%	60−65 +57.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 −60%	24−27 +60%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	8 −50%	12−14 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65 −53.8%	100−105 +53.8%
Metro Exodus	56 −60.7%	90−95 +60.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	37 −62.2%	60−65 +62.2%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−59.1%

35−40
+59.1%

This is how Quadro K5200 and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

Arc A770 is 68% faster in 1080p
Arc A770 is 68% faster in 1440p
Arc A770 is 75% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	15.64	25.85
Recency	22 July 2014	12 October 2022
Cost	$1699.74	$329
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	225 Watt