GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro K510M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K510M K610M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K510M with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K510M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.53

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms K510M by a whopping 1020% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1006348
Place by popularitynot in top-10023
Power efficiency3.9229.30
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGK208GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (12 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed846 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.5494.53
Floating-point processing power0.3249 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache16 KB2.5 MB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
1440p2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
4K2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−7300%
74
+7300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−450%
30−35
+450%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−6600%
67
+6600%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1867%
59
+1867%
Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−3000%
62
+3000%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−483%
35
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Valorant 35−40
−278%
130−140
+278%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−3900%
40
+3900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−544%
210−220
+544%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Dota 2 18−20
−521%
118
+521%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1667%
53
+1667%
Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−2550%
53
+2550%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3300%
68
+3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−333%
26
+333%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−729%
58
+729%
Valorant 35−40
−278%
130−140
+278%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Dota 2 18−20
−479%
110
+479%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−1533%
49
+1533%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
−689%
70−75
+689%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
−217%
19
+217%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−371%
33
+371%
Valorant 35−40
−278%
130−140
+278%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
−775%
35−40
+775%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1180%
120−130
+1180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−931%
160−170
+931%
Valorant 8−9
−2013%
160−170
+2013%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1750%
37
+1750%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−975%
40−45
+975%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−767%
24−27
+767%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−129%
30−35
+129%
Valorant 8−9
−1125%
95−100
+1125%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−750%
16−18
+750%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

1440p
High

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 18
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Quadro K510M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 7300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile performs better in 53 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.53 17.14
Recency 23 July 2013 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro K510M has 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1020.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
Quadro K610M Quadro K610M
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
NVS 5200M NVS 5200M
HD Graphics 5000 Intel Graphics 5000
vs
HD 8350G 8350G
HD Graphics 5000 Intel Graphics 5000
vs
R9 M395X Mac Edition M395X Mac Edition
HD Graphics 5000 Intel Graphics 5000
vs
VX 200 200
HD Graphics 5000 Intel Graphics 5000
vs
NVS 280 PCIe 280 PCIe
HD Graphics 5000 Intel Graphics 5000
vs
Pro WX 3200 3200
HD 7590M AMD HD 7590M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 565v 565v
HD 7590M AMD HD 7590M
vs
GTX 950M Mac Edition 950M Mac Edition
HD 7590M AMD HD 7590M
vs
9600 GT Rev. 2 9600 GT Rev. 2
HD 7650M AMD HD 7650M
vs
HD Graphics (Haswell) (Haswell)
HD 7650M AMD HD 7650M
vs
ATI Mobility HD 565v 565v

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3084 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K510M or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.