GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Quadro K510M

Quadro K100M Quadro K200M Quadro K500M Quadro K510M Quadro K610M Quadro K620M
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K510M with GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K510M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.54

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms K510M by a whopping 1026% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking963314
Place by popularitynot in top-10026
Power efficiency3.7628.20
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGK208GA107
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)17 December 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed846 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors915 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate13.5494.53
Floating-point processing power0.3249 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
VR Readyno data+
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.6
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
1440p2−3
−1500%
32
+1500%
4K2−3
−1300%
28
+1300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−580%
30−35
+580%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1300%
42
+1300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2850%
59
+2850%
Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 62
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
Valorant 35−40
−275%
130−140
+275%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 30−35
−547%
220−230
+547%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−867%
29
+867%
Dota 2 18−20
−521%
118
+521%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2550%
53
+2550%
Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 53
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
−3300%
68
+3300%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−420%
26
+420%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−1750%
35−40
+1750%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−729%
58
+729%
Valorant 35−40
−275%
130−140
+275%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 3−4
−2367%
70−75
+2367%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−733%
25
+733%
Dota 2 18−20
−479%
110
+479%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−2350%
49
+2350%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−800%
70−75
+800%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−280%
19
+280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
−560%
65−70
+560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−371%
33
+371%
Valorant 35−40
−275%
130−140
+275%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
−1800%
95−100
+1800%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 10−11
−1180%
120−130
+1180%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
−938%
160−170
+938%
Valorant 9−10
−1789%
170−180
+1789%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−640%
37
+640%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−800%
27−30
+800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−1233%
40−45
+1233%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−113%
30−35
+113%
Valorant 8−9
−1125%
95−100
+1125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 7−8
Dota 2 2−3
−1600%
34
+1600%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18
+350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−467%
16−18
+467%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 74
+0%
74
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 67
+0%
67
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40
+0%
40
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

This is how Quadro K510M and RTX 2050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1500% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 1300% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 3500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is ahead in 49 tests (78%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.54 17.34
Recency 23 July 2013 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 45 Watt

Quadro K510M has 50% lower power consumption.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1026% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
NVS 5400M NVS 5400M
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
HD 8970M Crossfire Radeon HD 8970M Crossfire
Quadro K510M Quadro K510M
vs
FX 3800M Quadro FX 3800M
PRO W7700 PRO W7700
vs
HD Graphics 615 HD Graphics 615
Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs
vs
R5 (Kaveri) R5 (Kaveri)
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
GeForce 710M 710M
R4 (Beema) R4 (Beema)
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
HD 6520G HD 6520G
vs
HD Graphics 5000 HD Graphics 5000
RTX A1000 RTX A1000
vs
HD 7590M HD 7590M
HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics HD 8550G + HD 8670M Dual Graphics
vs
HD 7650M HD 7650M
GeForce MX230 MX230
vs
FirePro M2000 M2000
RX 5600M RX 5600M
vs
HD 7630M HD 7630M
UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs UHD Graphics Xe 24EUs
vs
HD 8550G HD 8550G

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 2581 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K510M or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.