Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Quadro K1100M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

K1100M
2013
2GB GDDR5
2.81

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Quadro K1100M by 2368% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking75618
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.2121.17
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 21
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (10 years ago)8 December 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 $999
Current price$350 (3.2x MSRP)$957 (1x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 6900 XT has 9981% better value for money than K1100M.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845120
Core clock speed705 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate22.59720.0
Floating-point performance542.2 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro K1100M and Radeon RX 6900 XT compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2800 MHz16000 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMIno data+
Display Port1.2no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model56.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1100M 2.81
RX 6900 XT 69.35
+2368%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Quadro K1100M by 2368% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

K1100M 1086
RX 6900 XT 26849
+2372%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Quadro K1100M by 2372% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

K1100M 1827
RX 6900 XT 59119
+3137%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Quadro K1100M by 3137% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

K1100M 1341
RX 6900 XT 50587
+3674%

Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms Quadro K1100M by 3674% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
−972%
193
+972%
1440p5−6
−2580%
134
+2580%
4K3−4
−2667%
83
+2667%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2825%
117
+2825%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−3150%
195
+3150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1342%
170−180
+1342%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3825%
150−160
+3825%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3050%
126
+3050%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3943%
283
+3943%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5560%
283
+5560%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−5025%
205
+5025%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−3167%
196
+3167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2367%
222
+2367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−18900%
190
+18900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2550%
106
+2550%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−3167%
196
+3167%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−1342%
170−180
+1342%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3825%
150−160
+3825%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2975%
123
+2975%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3886%
279
+3886%
Hitman 3 5−6
−5420%
276
+5420%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−4250%
174
+4250%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−4000%
164
+4000%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−1967%
124
+1967%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2200%
207
+2200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
−4514%
323
+4514%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−16900%
170
+16900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2350%
98
+2350%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−3183%
197
+3183%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−2620%
130−140
+2620%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3825%
150−160
+3825%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−2850%
118
+2850%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−3443%
248
+3443%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−4000%
164
+4000%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−12000%
121
+12000%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2420%
120−130
+2420%
Hitman 3 6−7
−3450%
213
+3450%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−1411%
136
+1411%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−10100%
102
+10100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−8100%
82
+8100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2550%
159
+2550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 99
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−7300%
70−75
+7300%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−3250%
130−140
+3250%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−23000%
231
+23000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−4167%
120−130
+4167%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−3800%
75−80
+3800%
Hitman 3 3−4
−4167%
128
+4167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−443%
38
+443%
Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−5400%
55
+5400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6700%
68
+6700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−6500%
66
+6500%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−1950%
80−85
+1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−1583%
101
+1583%

This is how K1100M and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6900 XT is 972% faster than K1100M in 1080p
  • RX 6900 XT is 2580% faster than K1100M in 1440p
  • RX 6900 XT is 2667% faster than K1100M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 23000% faster than the K1100M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 6900 XT surpassed K1100M in all 53 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 2.81 69.35
Recency 23 July 2013 8 December 2020
Cost $109.94 $999
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 300 Watt

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
Radeon RX 6900 XT

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 179 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3385 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.