Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) vs Quadro K1000M

Place in the ranking	894	441
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.52	no data
Power efficiency	3.10	no data
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code name	GK107	Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)	14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.90	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	4
Core clock speed	850 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1950 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	13.60	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.3264 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	16	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_2
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1000M 2.02

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 10.38
+414%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1000M 1102

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) 6776
+515%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	9 −400%	45−50 +400%
Full HD	16 −56.3%	25 +56.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

7.49

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −37.5%	11 +37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −355%	50 +355%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −62.5%	13 +62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Dota 2	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −84.6%	24 +84.6%
Fortnite	10−11 −500%	60−65 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −255%	39 +255%
Grand Theft Auto V	4−5 −275%	15 +275%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −1300%	27−30 +1300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −238%	27−30 +238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −244%	30−35 +244%
World of Tanks	35−40 −279%	140−150 +279%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −750%	30−35 +750%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −125%	18−20 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Dota 2	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −223%	40−45 +223%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −173%	30 +173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	20−22 −300%	80−85 +300%

1440p
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	14−16
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −277%	45−50 +277%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −800%	9−10 +800%
World of Tanks	12−14 −469%	70−75 +469%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	20−22
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14−16 +367%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Valorant	8−9 −225%	24−27 +225%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −400%	30−33 +400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%
Dota 2	16−18 −400%	80−85 +400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Fortnite	0−1	10−12
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	7−8
Valorant	2−3 −400%	10−11 +400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Fortnite	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Valorant	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

This is how K1000M and Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) compete in popular games:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 400% faster in 900p
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 56% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is 1300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is ahead in 36 tests (67%)
there's a draw in 18 tests (33%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.02	10.38
Recency	1 June 2012	14 December 2023
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm

Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) has a 413.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1000M is a mobile workstation card while Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.