GeForce RTX 5080 vs Quadro K1000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1000M with GeForce RTX 5080, including specs and performance data.

K1000M
2012
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
2.01

RTX 5080 outperforms K1000M by a whopping 4589% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking9003
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.5440.75
Power efficiency3.0717.98
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGK107GB203
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)30 January 2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.90 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 5080 has 7446% better value for money than K1000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores19210752
Core clock speed850 MHz2295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2617 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt360 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60879.3
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS56.28 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs16336
Tensor Coresno data336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1875 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s960.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1000M 2.01
RTX 5080 94.24
+4589%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1000M 774
RTX 5080 36308
+4591%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9
−4344%
400−450
+4344%
Full HD18
−972%
193
+972%
1440p3−4
−5200%
159
+5200%
4K2−3
−5350%
109
+5350%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.66
−28.7%
5.18
+28.7%
1440p39.97
−536%
6.28
+536%
4K59.95
−554%
9.17
+554%
  • RTX 5080 has 29% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 has 536% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 has 554% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−4820%
240−250
+4820%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2513%
200−210
+2513%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5550%
220−230
+5550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−4820%
240−250
+4820%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3840%
190−200
+3840%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2513%
200−210
+2513%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5550%
220−230
+5550%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−10350%
200−210
+10350%
Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3340%
300−350
+3340%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−11900%
240−250
+11900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
Valorant 35−40
−1456%
600−650
+1456%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 5−6
−4820%
240−250
+4820%
Battlefield 5 5−6
−3840%
190−200
+3840%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2513%
200−210
+2513%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
−613%
270−280
+613%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5550%
220−230
+5550%
Dota 2 21−24
−4424%
950−1000
+4424%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−10350%
200−210
+10350%
Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3340%
300−350
+3340%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−11900%
240−250
+11900%
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
−5700%
170−180
+5700%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−7367%
220−230
+7367%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−5671%
400−450
+5671%
Valorant 35−40
−1456%
600−650
+1456%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−3840%
190−200
+3840%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
−2675%
222
+2675%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−5550%
220−230
+5550%
Dota 2 21−24
−4424%
950−1000
+4424%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−10350%
200−210
+10350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−3340%
300−350
+3340%
Forza Horizon 5 2−3
−4400%
90−95
+4400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1509%
170−180
+1509%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
−4029%
289
+4029%
Valorant 35−40
−1456%
600−650
+1456%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−3675%
300−350
+3675%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−7350%
140−150
+7350%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−3869%
500−550
+3869%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 160−170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
−1246%
170−180
+1246%
Valorant 14−16
−3364%
450−500
+3364%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−14200%
140−150
+14200%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−6533%
190−200
+6533%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−7550%
300−350
+7550%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
−4400%
45−50
+4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−8033%
244
+8033%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−4933%
150−160
+4933%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
−4400%
90
+4400%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1147%
180−190
+1147%
Valorant 10−11
−3220%
300−350
+3220%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 70−75
Dota 2 4−5
−4400%
180−190
+4400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−7700%
150−160
+7700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−3100%
95−100
+3100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 3−4
−2533%
75−80
+2533%

1440p
High Preset

Metro Exodus 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Metro Exodus 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 242
+0%
242
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

This is how K1000M and RTX 5080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 is 4344% faster in 900p
  • RTX 5080 is 972% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5080 is 5200% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5080 is 5350% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 5080 is 14200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5080 is ahead in 51 test (86%)
  • there's a draw in 8 tests (14%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.01 94.24
Recency 1 June 2012 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 360 Watt

K1000M has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX 5080, on the other hand, has a 4588.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1000M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Quadro K1000M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080
GeForce RTX 5080

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 88 votes

Rate Quadro K1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 767 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1000M or GeForce RTX 5080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.