TITAN RTX vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with TITAN RTX, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
49.61
+5.1%

GV100 outperforms TITAN RTX by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5365
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.872.11
Power efficiency14.2012.06
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU102
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (6 years ago)18 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro GV100 has 36% better value for money than TITAN RTX.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51204608
Core clock speed1132 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6509.8
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs12896
TMUs320288
Tensor Cores640576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GV100 49.61
+5.1%
TITAN RTX 47.19

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19824
+5.1%
TITAN RTX 18858

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 144949
TITAN RTX 148699
+2.6%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro GV100 180942
+8.7%
TITAN RTX 166517

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD170−180
+4.9%
162
−4.9%
1440p100−110
−3%
103
+3%
4K75−80
+2.7%
73
−2.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p52.94
−243%
15.43
+243%
1440p89.99
−271%
24.26
+271%
4K119.99
−251%
34.23
+251%
  • TITAN RTX has 243% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX has 271% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX has 251% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 85
+0%
85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 91
+0%
91
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 351
+0%
351
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Valorant 246
+0%
246
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 205
+0%
205
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120
+0%
120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 86
+0%
86
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Fortnite 185
+0%
185
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 286
+0%
286
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 118
+0%
118
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 248
+0%
248
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 171
+0%
171
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 110
+0%
110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Dota 2 148
+0%
148
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 242
+0%
242
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 143
+0%
143
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 192
+0%
192
+0%
Valorant 236
+0%
236
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+0%
114
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+0%
63
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 183
+0%
183
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Metro Exodus 114
+0%
114
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Valorant 192
+0%
192
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 134
+0%
134
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 197
+0%
197
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 41
+0%
41
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 134
+0%
134
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18
+0%
18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Fortnite 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 109
+0%
109
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Valorant 105
+0%
105
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 5% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 3% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 3% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 49.61 47.19
Recency 27 March 2018 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 280 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 5.1% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 12% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro GV100 and TITAN RTX.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while TITAN RTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA TITAN RTX
TITAN RTX

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 53 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 819 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.