Quadro RTX 6000 vs Quadro GV100
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro GV100 and Quadro RTX 6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
GV100 outperforms RTX 6000 by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 71 | 87 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.99 | 5.95 |
| Power efficiency | 14.06 | 12.63 |
| Architecture | Volta (2017−2020) | Turing (2018−2022) |
| GPU code name | GV100 | TU102 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
| Release date | 27 March 2018 (7 years ago) | 13 August 2018 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $8,999 | $6,299 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
RTX 6000 has 99% better value for money than Quadro GV100.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 5120 | 4608 |
| Core clock speed | 1132 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1627 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 21,100 million | 18,600 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 260 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 520.6 | 509.8 |
| Floating-point processing power | 16.66 TFLOPS | 16.31 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 128 | 96 |
| TMUs | 320 | 288 |
| Tensor Cores | 640 | 576 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 72 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 848 MHz | 1750 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 868.4 GB/s | 672.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | 4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.5 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 7.0 | 7.5 |
| DLSS | + | + |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 49.67 | 46.40 |
| Recency | 27 March 2018 | 13 August 2018 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 32 GB | 24 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 250 Watt | 260 Watt |
Quadro GV100 has a 7% higher aggregate performance score, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.
RTX 6000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro GV100 and Quadro RTX 6000.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
