GeForce GTX 1660 vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 SUPER GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1660 GTX 1660 Super GTX 1660 Ti

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with GeForce GTX 1660, including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
47.75
+70.1%

GV100 outperforms GTX 1660 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
GTX 1660 GTX 1660

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63202
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.0543.94
Power efficiency13.9917.13
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGV100TU116
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date27 March 2018 (7 years ago)14 March 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 $219

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 has 1341% better value for money than Quadro GV100.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51201408
Core clock speed1132 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speed1627 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors21,100 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6157.1
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPS5.027 TFLOPS
ROPs12848
TMUs32088
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm229 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB6 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed848 MHz2001 MHz
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/s192.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.07.5
DLSS+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GV100 47.75
+70.1%
GTX 1660 28.07

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GV100 19824
+70.1%
GTX 1660 11654

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro GV100 143963
+148%
GTX 1660 57997

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro GV100 180942
+201%
GTX 1660 60172

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD140−150
+68.7%
83
−68.7%
1440p85−90
+70%
50
−70%
4K45−50
+66.7%
27
−66.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p64.28
−2336%
2.64
+2336%
1440p105.87
−2317%
4.38
+2317%
4K199.98
−2365%
8.11
+2365%
  • GTX 1660 has 2336% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 has 2317% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 has 2365% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 271
+0%
271
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+0%
71
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 79
+0%
79
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 223
+0%
223
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 100
+0%
100
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 59
+0%
59
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 306
+0%
306
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+0%
47
+0%
Dota 2 219
+0%
219
+0%
Far Cry 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 123
+0%
123
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 115
+0%
115
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 46
+0%
46
+0%
Metro Exodus 57
+0%
57
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 102
+0%
102
+0%
Valorant 287
+0%
287
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Dota 2 197
+0%
197
+0%
Far Cry 5 86
+0%
86
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 57
+0%
57
+0%
Valorant 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 52
+0%
52
+0%
Metro Exodus 33
+0%
33
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+0%
129
+0%
Valorant 226
+0%
226
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24
+0%
24
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+0%
76
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24
+0%
24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16
+0%
16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 49
+0%
49
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Metro Exodus 20
+0%
20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35
+0%
35
+0%
Valorant 125
+0%
125
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10
+0%
10
+0%
Dota 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50
+0%
50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 13
+0%
13
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and GTX 1660 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 69% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GV100 is 70% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro GV100 is 67% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 47.75 28.07
Recency 27 March 2018 14 March 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 70.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1660, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 108.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 1660 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GeForce GTX 1660
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
GTX 1660 GeForce GTX 1660
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
GT 625 OEM GT 625 OEM
vs
GTX 745 OEM GTX 745 OEM
GT 1030 GT 1030
vs
UHD Graphics 64EU UHD Graphics 64EU
RTX 2080 Super Max-Q RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
A10G A10G
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
9600 GT 9600 GT
vs
FX 5700 FX 5700
R5 Graphics R5 Graphics
vs
R5 (Stoney Ridge) R5 (Stoney Ridge)
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
vs
L40 L40
6150 SE + nForce 430 6150 SE + nForce 430
vs
GTX 1650 GTX 1650
GTX 980 Ti 980 Ti
vs
GTX 490 490
Quadro M520 M520
vs
GeForce MX450 MX450

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 54 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5765 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or GeForce GTX 1660, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.