Quadro NVS 290 vs FX 5500

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX 5500
2006
1024 MB GDDR3
0.63
+6.8%

FX 5500 outperforms NVS 290 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11511163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money0.01no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G86
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)4 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 $149
Current price$150 (0.1x MSRP)$68 (0.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 5500 and NVS 290 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed650 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors278 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate15.603.672
Floating-point performanceno data29.376 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1010 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.32 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data1.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 5500 0.63
+6.8%
NVS 290 0.59

FX 5500 outperforms NVS 290 by 7% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 5500 242
+6.1%
NVS 290 228

FX 5500 outperforms NVS 290 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.63 0.59
Recency 20 April 2006 4 October 2007
Cost $2999 $149
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 21 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 5500 and Quadro NVS 290.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 vote

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.