Quadro NVS 280 PCI vs Quadro FX 5500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5500 and Quadro NVS 280 PCI, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 5500
2006
1 GB GDDR3, 96 Watt
0.60
+2900%

FX 5500 outperforms NVS 280 PCI by a whopping 2900% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12051497
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.450.11
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG71NV34 B1
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)28 October 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed650 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors278 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)96 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate15.601.100
ROPs162
TMUs244

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Length229 mm168 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed505 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth32.32 GB/s8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5500 0.60
+2900%
NVS 280 PCI 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5500 242
+2925%
NVS 280 PCI 8

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.60 0.02
Recency 20 April 2006 28 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 96 Watt 13 Watt

FX 5500 has a 2900% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 66.7% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 280 PCI, on the other hand, has 638.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro FX 5500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 280 PCI in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCI
Quadro NVS 280 PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 280 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5500 or Quadro NVS 280 PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.