Radeon RX Vega 7 vs Quadro FX 3600M

Place in the ranking	1057	530
Place by popularity	not in top-100	12
Power efficiency	1.27	36.20
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code name	G92	Vega Raven Ridge
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 February 2008 (16 years ago)	7 January 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	64	448
Core clock speed	500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	no data	1800 MHz
Number of transistors	754 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.00	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.16 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-HE	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	no data
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	no data
Memory bus width	256 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	799 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	51.14 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12_1
Shader Model	4.0	no data
OpenGL	3.3	no data
OpenCL	1.1	no data
Vulkan	N/A	-
CUDA	1.1	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	3−4 −667%	23 +667%
1440p	5−6 −560%	33 +560%
4K	2−3 −700%	16 +700%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−500%

18
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −250%	21 +250%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −325%	17 +325%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −367%	14 +367%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	17 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Hitman 3	6−7 −133%	14 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −207%	40−45 +207%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −213%	24−27 +213%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −197%	95 +197%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −483%	35 +483%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −350%	18 +350%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −233%	10 +233%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −600%	21−24 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Hitman 3	6−7 −133%	14 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −421%	73 +421%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −750%	17 +750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −200%	24 +200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −100%	21−24 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −150%	80 +150%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −200%	18−20 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −275%	14−16 +275%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −200%	9 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1600%	16−18 +1600%
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 −1250%	27 +1250%
Hitman 3	6−7 −133%	14−16 +133%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −57.1%	22 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −163%	21 +163%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −18.2%	13 +18.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −71.9%	55−60 +71.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−800%

18
+800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −1300%	14−16 +1300%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −450%	10−12 +450%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	7−8
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Hitman 3	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −300%	16−18 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	7−8
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −840%	45−50 +840%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−225%

12−14
+225%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

5−6

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −300%	4−5 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	0−1	3−4
Far Cry 5	0−1	4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−250%

7−8
+250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 +0%	19 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	27 +0%	27 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +0%	15 +0%
Battlefield 5	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Metro Exodus	21 +0%	21 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +0%	3−4 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 +0%	6−7 +0%
Hitman 3	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	13 +0%	13 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how FX 3600M and RX Vega 7 compete in popular games:

RX Vega 7 is 667% faster in 1080p
RX Vega 7 is 560% faster in 1440p
RX Vega 7 is 700% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RX Vega 7 is 2350% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RX Vega 7 is ahead in 47 tests (70%)
there's a draw in 20 tests (30%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.21	7.40
Recency	23 February 2008	7 January 2020
Chip lithography	65 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	70 Watt	15 Watt

RX Vega 7 has a 511.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX Vega 7 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3600M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3600M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.