GeForce RTX 4090 vs NVS 3100M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

NVS 3100M
2010
512 MB GDDR3, DDR3
0.53

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms NVS 3100M by 18768% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11811
Place by popularitynot in top-1007
Value for moneyno data10.78
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Ada Lovelace
GPU code nameN10M-NSAD102-300-A1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years old)20 September 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599
Current price$269 $1756 (1.1x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

NVS 3100M and RTX 4090 have a nearly equal value for money.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616384
Core clock speed600 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors260 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8481,290
Floating-point performance46.98 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on NVS 3100M and GeForce RTX 4090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount512 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz21000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.64 GB/s1,008 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMIno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.28.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 3100M 0.53
RTX 4090 100.00
+18768%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms NVS 3100M by 18768% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 3100M 204
RTX 4090 38733
+18887%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms NVS 3100M by 18887% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

NVS 3100M 1121
RTX 4090 137170
+12142%

GeForce RTX 4090 outperforms NVS 3100M by 12142% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−26400%
265
+26400%
1440p1−2
−21100%
212
+21100%
4K0−1150

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7400%
225
+7400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2125%
170−180
+2125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7300%
222
+7300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−9000%
180−190
+9000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4800%
294
+4800%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−2125%
170−180
+2125%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−7033%
214
+7033%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−22500%
226
+22500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−9000%
180−190
+9000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−4700%
288
+4700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−19000%
573
+19000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−6900%
210
+6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−10067%
305
+10067%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−7350%
140−150
+7350%
Hitman 3 3−4
−7000%
210−220
+7000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−2863%
237
+2863%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−6675%
271
+6675%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15300%
154
+15300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−18500%
186
+18500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−26700%
268
+26700%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−9500%
95−100
+9500%
Hitman 3 1−2
−12700%
120−130
+12700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−2571%
187
+2571%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−5667%
173
+5667%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−2800%
145
+2800%

This is how NVS 3100M and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 26400% faster than NVS 3100M

1440p resolution:

  • RTX 4090 is 21100% faster than NVS 3100M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 is 26700% faster than the NVS 3100M.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed NVS 3100M in all 25 of our tests.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 0.53 100.00
Recency 7 January 2010 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 450 Watt

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.

Be aware that NVS 3100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 119 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 10996 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.