HD Graphics P4600 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
2020
28 Watt
9.37
+501%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs outperforms HD Graphics P4600 by a whopping 501% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking440923
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.03
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)Generation 7.5 (2013)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XeHaswell GT2
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)1 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Current priceno data$225

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96160
Core clock speed400 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistorsno data392 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt84 Watt
Texture fill rateno data24.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and HD Graphics P4600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interfaceno dataIGP
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.3
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkanno data1.1.80

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+550%
4−5
−550%
1440p16
+700%
2−3
−700%
4K13
+550%
2−3
−550%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20
+567%
3−4
−567%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+633%
3−4
−633%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+600%
3−4
−600%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 36
+620%
5−6
−620%
Cyberpunk 2077 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+550%
4−5
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Hitman 3 39
+550%
6−7
−550%
Horizon Zero Dawn 46
+557%
7−8
−557%
Metro Exodus 35
+600%
5−6
−600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 38
+533%
6−7
−533%
Watch Dogs: Legion 22
+633%
3−4
−633%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+800%
2−3
−800%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+625%
4−5
−625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+567%
3−4
−567%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 31
+520%
5−6
−520%
Far Cry New Dawn 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Hitman 3 22
+633%
3−4
−633%
Horizon Zero Dawn 34
+580%
5−6
−580%
Metro Exodus 27
+575%
4−5
−575%
Red Dead Redemption 2 15
+650%
2−3
−650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 25
+525%
4−5
−525%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+650%
4−5
−650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+600%
2−3
−600%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 23
+667%
3−4
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+600%
4−5
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+560%
5−6
−560%
Horizon Zero Dawn 22
+633%
3−4
−633%
Metro Exodus 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14
+600%
2−3
−600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Hitman 3 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 16
+700%
2−3
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+750%
2−3
−750%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 19
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Metro Exodus 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

This is how Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs and HD Graphics P4600 compete in popular games:

  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 550% faster in 1080p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 700% faster in 1440p
  • Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is 550% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.37 1.56
Recency 15 August 2020 1 June 2013
Chip lithography 10 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 84 Watt

The Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs is a notebook card while HD Graphics P4600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
Intel HD Graphics P4600
HD Graphics P4600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 811 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 31 vote

Rate HD Graphics P4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.