UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Iris Plus Graphics 645
3.97
+104%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 104% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking652854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake (2019)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 July 2019 (4 years old)11 January 2021 (3 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4832
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz900 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40no data

Size and compatibility

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 645 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 3.97
+104%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1.95

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 104% in our combined benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985
+87.9%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1589

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 88% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893
+86.3%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) 1016

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) by 86% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+225%
8
−225%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Hitman 3 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+125%
4
−125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+200%
3
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Metro Exodus 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 4−5
+100%
2−3
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1

This is how Iris Plus Graphics 645 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 225% faster than UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics 645 is 700% faster than the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU).

All in all, in popular games:

  • Iris Plus Graphics 645 is ahead in 46 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (4%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 3.97 1.95
Recency 10 July 2019 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

The Iris Plus Graphics 645 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 104 votes

Rate Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 12 votes

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.