UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) vs Iris Plus Graphics 645

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now no data
Games supported 59%
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x1
  • Core clock speed 300
  • Max video memory System Shared
  • Memory type DDR3, DDR4
  • Memory clock speed System Shared
  • Maximum resolution
Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
Buy
  • Interface
  • Core clock speed 350
  • Max video memory
  • Memory type
  • Memory clock speed
  • Maximum resolution
Price now no data
Games supported 58%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating651750
ArchitectureGen. 9.5 Coffee Lake (2019)Gen. 11 (2021)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT3eGen. 11
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date10 July 2019
(3 years old)
11 January 2021
(2 years old)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4824
Core clock speed300 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1150 MHz800 MHz
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)15 Watt4.8 - 10 Watt
Texture fill rate50.40no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Iris Plus Graphics 645 and UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x1no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3, DDR4no data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync++

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL2.1no data
Vulkan1.1.103no data

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Plus Graphics 645 2.98
+40.6%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 2.12
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 2985
+105%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1458

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 105% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1736
+66.4%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1043

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 66% in 3DMark Fire Strike Score.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Iris Plus Graphics 645 1893
+71.2%
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) 1106

Iris Plus Graphics 645 outperforms UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) by 71% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD25
+108%
12
−108%

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
Hitman 3 2−3 no data
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 no data
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 no data
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Battlefield 5 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Far Cry 5 3−4 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 no data
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 no data
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 no data
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Hitman 3 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 0−1
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 2.98 2.12
Recency 10 July 2019 11 January 2021
Pipelines / CUDA cores 48 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 15 Watt 4 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645
Iris Plus Graphics 645

since it shows better performance.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 87 ratings

Rate Intel Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 14 ratings

Rate Intel UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.