Radeon R7 265 vs GeForce GT 1030 GK107

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated436
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.06
Power efficiencyno data4.81
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2011−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Pitcairn
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date30 September 2018 (6 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3841024
Core clock speed1058 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate33.8659.20
Floating-point processing power0.8125 TFLOPS1.894 TFLOPS
ROPs1632
TMUs3264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length147 mm210 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1 x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s179.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinity-+
HDMI++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

CrossFire-+
FreeSync-+
DDMA audiono data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)DirectX® 12
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.126-
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 September 2018 13 February 2014
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 150 Watt

GT 1030 GK107 has an age advantage of 4 years, and 130.8% lower power consumption.

R7 265, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 1030 GK107 and Radeon R7 265. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 GK107
GeForce GT 1030 GK107
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 83 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 GK107 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 373 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.