Quadro T2000 Mobile vs HD Graphics 620

Place in performance ranking	803	250
Place by popularity	41	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.46	4.70
Architecture	Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake (2015−2017)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	Kaby-Lake GT2	N19P-Q3
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 August 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$353	$2221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T2000 Mobile has 922% better value for money than HD Graphics 620.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	24	1024
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1575 MHz
Boost clock speed	1050 MHz	1785 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	25.20	114.2
Floating-point performance	403.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 620 and Quadro T2000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.1	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	no data	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.42

T2000 Mobile 20.64
+753%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 753% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

HD Graphics 620 935

T2000 Mobile 7985
+754%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 754% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

HD Graphics 620 1509

T2000 Mobile 13524
+796%

Quadro T2000 Mobile outperforms HD Graphics 620 by 796% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−686%

110−120
+686%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−560%

30−35
+560%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −391%	50−55 +391%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Far Cry 5	6 −800%	50−55 +800%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	11 −545%	70−75 +545%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1367%	40−45 +1367%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −580%	30−35 +580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5 −780%	40−45 +780%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	40−45

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −391%	50−55 +391%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1700%	50−55 +1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1320%	70−75 +1320%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1400%	60−65 +1400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	3−4 −1367%	40−45 +1367%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1000%	30−35 +1000%
Red Dead Redemption 2	5−6 −580%	30−35 +580%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −389%	40−45 +389%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5 −800%	45−50 +800%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	40−45

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1300%	40−45 +1300%
Battlefield 5	4−5 −1625%	65−70 +1625%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1700%	50−55 +1700%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −1320%	70−75 +1320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −650%	45−50 +650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	40−45

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%
Hitman 3	5−6 −560%	30−35 +560%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −200%	27−30 +200%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −1900%	20−22 +1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1400%	14−16 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	6−7 −350%	27−30 +350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1100%	12−14 +1100%
Far Cry 5	4−5 −775%	35−40 +775%
Forza Horizon 4	0−1	40−45
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Hitman 3	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −467%	16−18 +467%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

T2000 Mobile is 686% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Far Cry New Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 2650% faster than the HD Graphics 620.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, T2000 Mobile surpassed HD Graphics 620 in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.42	20.64
Recency	30 August 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	32 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	60 Watt