Intel HD Graphics 620 vs AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Comparison of HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M architecture, market type and release date.
HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
PCIe 3.0 x1
Parameters of memory installed on HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.
Technological solutions and APIs supported by HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
APIs supported by HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
HD Graphics 620 4.32
HD 6750M 4.33 +0.2%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
HD Graphics 620 1509 +30.2%
HD 6750M 1159
3DMark Vantage Performance
HD Graphics 620 5803 +5.8%
HD 6750M 5483
HD Graphics 620 935
HD 6750M 937 +0.2%
Cryptocurrency mining performance of HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
Let's see how good HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 620
Much newer (30 August 2016 vs 4 January 2011)
Finer manufacturing process technology (14 vs 40 nm)
Less power hungry (15 vs 35 watts)
Quick Sync (hardware acceleration of video encoding and decoding for Intel CPUs. Speeds up video encoding by times, but at the cost of somewhat lower quality)
Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)
Advantages of AMD Radeon HD 6750M
0.2% faster in synthetic tests
More pipelines (480 vs 192)
So, HD Graphics 620 or HD 6750M?
Technical City couldn't decide between Intel HD Graphics 620 and AMD Radeon HD 6750M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between HD Graphics 620 and Radeon HD 6750M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.