Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs HD Graphics 620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 620 with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 620
2016
32 GB DDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4, 15 Watt
2.42

T1000 Max-Q outperforms HD Graphics 620 by a whopping 619% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking847312
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency11.6225.06
ArchitectureGeneration 9.5 (2016−2020)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameKaby Lake GT2TU117
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date30 August 2016 (8 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192896
Core clock speed300 MHz765 MHz
Boost clock speed1000 MHz1350 MHz
Number of transistors189 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm++12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0075.60
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS2.419 TFLOPS
ROPs332
TMUs2456

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3L/LPDDR3/LPDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Sync+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA-7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 620 2.42
T1000 Max-Q 17.40
+619%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 620 935
T1000 Max-Q 6713
+618%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD13
−592%
90−95
+592%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 6
−583%
40−45
+583%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Forza Horizon 4 25
−340%
110−120
+340%
Hitman 3 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−330%
85−90
+330%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14
−307%
55−60
+307%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−130%
85−90
+130%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Battlefield 5 3−4
−1800%
55−60
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
−683%
45−50
+683%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−330%
85−90
+330%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−5900%
60−65
+5900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
−167%
40−45
+167%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−130%
85−90
+130%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
−388%
35−40
+388%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−440%
27−30
+440%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−925%
40−45
+925%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−371%
30−35
+371%
Horizon Zero Dawn 20−22
−330%
85−90
+330%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−418%
55−60
+418%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−208%
40−45
+208%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−130%
85−90
+130%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−840%
45−50
+840%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−575%
27−30
+575%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1800%
18−20
+1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hitman 3 7−8
−200%
21−24
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−650%
100−110
+650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−480%
27−30
+480%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 16−18
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−1200%
12−14
+1200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−400%
14−16
+400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how HD Graphics 620 and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is 592% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 5900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 56 tests (80%)
  • there's a draw in 14 tests (20%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.42 17.40
Recency 30 August 2016 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 50 Watt

HD Graphics 620 has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 619% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 620 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 620 is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 620
HD Graphics 620
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 2596 votes

Rate HD Graphics 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.