Radeon PRO W7700 vs HD Graphics 405

Place in performance ranking	1126	40
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.01	25.14
Architecture	Gen. 8 (2015−2016)	RDNA 3.0 (2022)
GPU code name	Braswell	Navi 32
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	1 April 2016 (8 years ago)	13 November 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999
Current price	$254	$999 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

PRO W7700 has 251300% better value for money than HD Graphics 405.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	16	3072
Core clock speed	320 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	700 MHz	2600 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	6 Watt	190 Watt
Texture fill rate	11.20	499.2
Floating-point performance	213.1 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 405 and Radeon PRO W7700 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	241 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	16 GB
Memory bus width	64/128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	no data	576.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x DisplayPort 2.1

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.7
OpenGL	4.3	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	2.2
Vulkan	1.1.80	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−7233%

1100−1150
+7233%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4
−7233%

220−230

+7233%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Hitman 3	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −7122%	650−700 +7122%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Hitman 3	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	9−10 −7122%	650−700 +7122%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −7400%	150−160 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −6900%	350−400 +6900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −7173%	800−850 +7173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −7233%	220−230 +7233%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5

0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −7400%	300−310 +7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%