Quadro T1000 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

T1000 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 2444% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1187324
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data23.04
ArchitectureGeneration 6.0 (2011)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameSandy Bridge GT2+TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed650 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1300 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors1,160 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown50 Watt
Texture fill rate15.60no data
Floating-point processing power0.2496 TFLOPSno data
ROPs2no data
TMUs12no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceRing BusPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Shared8000 MHz
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 3000 0.66
Quadro T1000 16.79
+2444%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 3000 254
Quadro T1000 6467
+2446%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−2400%
200−210
+2400%

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2355%
270−280
+2355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2355%
270−280
+2355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−2400%
100−105
+2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Hitman 3 5−6
−2300%
120−130
+2300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−2355%
270−280
+2355%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2400%
250−260
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−2400%
750−800
+2400%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2400%
150−160
+2400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−2400%
75−80
+2400%
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−2300%
24−27
+2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−2400%
50−55
+2400%

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro T1000 is 2400% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 16.79
Recency 1 February 2011 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 32 nm 12 nm

Quadro T1000 has a 2443.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8
2440 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
407 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.