Quadro T1000 vs HD Graphics 5500

Place in the ranking	978	327
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.95	23.20
Architecture	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	Broadwell GT2	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	5 September 2014 (10 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	no data
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	850 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	1,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.40	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.3264 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	3	no data
TMUs	24	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	Ring Bus	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	no data
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	no data
Memory bus width	System Shared	no data
Memory clock speed	System Shared	8000 MHz
Shared memory	+	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_1)	12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 5500 1.51

Quadro T1000 16.81
+1013%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

HD Graphics 5500 581

Quadro T1000 6462
+1012%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	13 −977%	140−150 +977%
Full HD	10 −1000%	110−120 +1000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Elden Ring	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2	6 −983%	65−70 +983%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Dota 2	8 −963%	85−90 +963%
Elden Ring	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Far Cry 5	9 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Fortnite	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Grand Theft Auto V	4 −900%	40−45 +900%
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −963%	170−180 +963%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6 −983%	65−70 +983%
World of Tanks	20 −1000%	220−230 +1000%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Dota 2	13 −977%	140−150 +977%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −991%	120−130 +991%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −963%	170−180 +963%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
World of Tanks	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1011%	100−105 +1011%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −950%	21−24 +950%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −1000%	55−60 +1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −900%	30−33 +900%
Valorant	7−8 −971%	75−80 +971%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −963%	170−180 +963%
Elden Ring	0−1	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	4−5 −900%	40−45 +900%
Red Dead Redemption 2	0−1	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −967%	160−170 +967%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Dota 2	16−18 −963%	170−180 +963%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
Valorant	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%

This is how HD Graphics 5500 and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

Quadro T1000 is 977% faster in 900p
Quadro T1000 is 1000% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.51	16.81
Recency	5 September 2014	27 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	15 Watt	50 Watt

HD Graphics 5500 has 233.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has a 1013.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 5500 is a notebook card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.