Quadro M2000 vs Radeon R9 270X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

R9 270X
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 180 Watt
12.64
+22.4%

Radeon R9 270X outperforms Quadro M2000 by a significant 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking367406
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.554.12
ArchitectureGCN (2011−2017)Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code nameCuracao XTGM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Designreferenceno data
Release date8 October 2013 (10 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $437.75
Current price$136 (0.7x MSRP)$285 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

R9 270X has 10% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280768
Core clock speedno data796 MHz
Boost clock speed1050 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate84.0055.82
Floating-point performance2,688 gflops1,812 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data201 mm
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors2 x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data6612 MHz
Memory bandwidth179.2 GB/sUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortDP DP DP DP
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
Eyefinity+no data
HDMI+no data
DisplayPort support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAcceleration+no data
CrossFire1no data
Enduro-no data
FreeSync1no data
HD3D+no data
LiquidVR1no data
PowerTune-no data
TressFX1no data
TrueAudio+no data
ZeroCore-no data
UVD+no data
DDMA audio+no data
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX® 1212
Shader Model5.15
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
Mantle-no data
CUDAno data5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

R9 270X 12.64
+22.4%
Quadro M2000 10.33

Radeon R9 270X outperforms Quadro M2000 by 22% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

R9 270X 4888
+22.4%
Quadro M2000 3995

Radeon R9 270X outperforms Quadro M2000 by 22% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Hitman 3 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+26.7%
30−33
−26.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+29.6%
27−30
−29.6%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Hitman 3 18−20
+28.6%
14−16
−28.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+25%
12−14
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 27−30
+33.3%
21−24
−33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Hitman 3 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Battlefield 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.64 10.33
Recency 8 October 2013 8 April 2016
Cost $199 $437.75
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 75 Watt

The Radeon R9 270X is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon R9 270X is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon R9 270X
Radeon R9 270X
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 706 votes

Rate Radeon R9 270X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 194 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.