GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 vs HD Graphics 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared HD Graphics 3000 with GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

HD Graphics 3000
2011
0.66

GTS 450 Rev. 2 outperforms HD Graphics 3000 by a whopping 565% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1147630
Place by popularity90not in top-100
ArchitectureGen. 6 Sandy Bridge (2011)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameSandy BridgeGF116
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 February 2011 (13 years ago)15 March 2011 (13 years ago)
Current price$476 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12192
Core clock speed350 MHz783 MHz
Boost clock speed1350 MHzno data
Number of transistors995 million1,170 million
Manufacturing process technology32 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown106 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8025.06
Floating-point performance20.4 gflops601.3 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on HD Graphics 3000 and GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1 GB
Memory bus width64/128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared3608 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data57.73 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMIno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.1
OpenGL3.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDAno data2.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8
−525%
50−55
+525%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 0−1 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 0−1 2−3
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 3−4
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 3−4
Horizon Zero Dawn 1−2
−1100%
12−14
+1100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 3−4
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 0−1 6−7
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 3−4

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 3−4

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 0−1 4−5

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 2−3

This is how HD Graphics 3000 and GTS 450 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • GTS 450 Rev. 2 is 525% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.66 4.39
Recency 1 February 2011 15 March 2011
Chip lithography 32 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 3000 is a notebook card while GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel HD Graphics 3000
HD Graphics 3000
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 2220 votes

Rate HD Graphics 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 39 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.